Completed
Last Updated: 26 Sep 2014 11:19 by ADMIN
ADMIN
Cody
Created on: 08 Feb 2013 17:39
Type: Feature Request
3
Customers misunderstand the IsVisible property
Here is a very common misconception users have over our “Visibility” property, in both code and non-coded verification steps. When they read “Visible” they automatically assume if an element is not present, it’s “not visible” and therefore expect “is visible” to return false. Instead it throws an exception “element not found” and they don’t expect this behavior from this property. 
2 comments
ADMIN
Konstantin Petkov
Posted on: 26 Sep 2014 11:16
This seems a duplicate of the following item (which is more descriptive):
http://feedback.telerik.com/Project/161/Feedback/Details/127428-what-a-verify-isvisible-actually-does-is-not-intuitive
ADMIN
Konstantin Petkov
Posted on: 11 Feb 2013 09:08
Some more confusion comes because of the concept of Visibility is also platform specific. In HTML it is style and parent element dependency and in SL/WPF it's just a property of the element. My assumption is this feedback comes from automating a SL application.