Declined
Last Updated: 15 Jan 2025 08:50 by ADMIN
Created by: Jeff
Comments: 2
Type: Bug Report
0
We have an installation of the Telerik runtime that appears as though it may be reliant on Microsoft.NET Core 6.0.36.34214 and ASP.NET Core 6.0.36.
These are being flagged by our security scans as a critical vulnerability as the Security End of Life for .NET Core 6 ended November 12, 2024.

Could you please confirm if Telerik Runtime is reliant on Microsoft.NET Core 6.0.36.34214 and ASP.NET Core 6.0.36, and if so, provide the timelines for a patch to address the dependent libraries?

Thanks in advance,

Jeff Harrison
Declined
Last Updated: 14 Jan 2025 15:00 by ADMIN

We've observed an odd behaviour where data driven tests set up with local data seem to only execute the first iteration when using the "run to here" and "run selected steps" options.  According to the log, it correctly identifies the test as being data driven, identifies that it is executing the first iteration but does not execute any further iterations.  (No errors or failures of subsequent iterations are present in the log).   This occurs regardless of if the test is run as a standalone test, or a test-as-step in a larger test (in which case, after running the first iteration of the sub-test, the next step in the parent following the test-as-step runs (and fails on a data validation error since the other iterations did not execute).

On further analysis we determined that if the entire test is fully executed, it does seem to find and run all iterations of the subtest, so it seems only the partial run options seem to be encountering the issue.

We're unsure if this is by design, or if there is a configuration setting that may control only 1 iteration running when using the other run options.

Thanks,


Jeff Harrison

Declined
Last Updated: 30 Sep 2024 08:54 by ADMIN

Current Test Studio wouldn't prompt Save dialog when close unsaved test case file. User may lost track for changed file.

Request when close any unsaved file on Test Studio, it should prompt user a Save Dialog, let user notice and decide to save.

 
Declined
Last Updated: 30 Sep 2024 08:48 by ADMIN
Created by: Eng Keat
Comments: 1
Type: Feature Request
0

Current test studio would auto remove element if not used by any test cases, without user notification.

For real world scenario, those element may needed in later test cases. It is a nightmare if an element not found when needed. Also those element may used in custom code file.

Request to enhance Test Studio to let user decide which element to removed. Yours can highlight or change font of unused elements, so that user notified and manage it after that.

Declined
Last Updated: 26 Sep 2024 12:52 by Lawrence
While...Loops are very useful but, in some circumstances, result in an infinite loop. It would be useful to have a property to set which would allow the TS user to put a limit on the number of loops before failing/moving on.
Declined
Last Updated: 25 Jul 2024 07:37 by ADMIN

When initiating a 'Record' on a web test in Test Studio, the relevant browser (Edge Chromium, but Firefox and Chrome have been tried) is launched and URL navigated to, but only a single step is recorded:

Navigate to : '/'

 

We are attempting to record regression tests against a custom web app. Steps are recorded fine if navigating to (for example) google.com and typing in a search query.

 

Please let me know what further information I can provide to narrow this down.

Declined
Last Updated: 30 May 2024 11:20 by ADMIN
Created by: entwicklung
Comments: 1
Type: Bug Report
0

1. Edit a Test
2. Test shows * for pending changes
3. Can't find a ribbon button for saving the changes -> I can only use [CTRL]+[S]

Maybe you can add the button in the section "Edit" or as seperate big button before the "Edit" section?

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 09:00 by ADMIN

A picture is worth a thousand words...

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:59 by ADMIN
Currently Test Studio load test can only use a dynamic target of type URL, if this takes its value from the response of a previous request. It will be useful to allow data driving this type of dynamic target with data from external source. 
Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:59 by ADMIN

The Kendo Angular Multiselect control is not covered with the built-in translators.

It will be very useful and consistent if such translator is added in Test Studio.

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:51 by ADMIN
It will be useful to implement global timeout settings in the context of API project. For example, if having multiple Http Requests steps, which timeout requires to be increased, you need to go through each separate step.  
Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:32 by ADMIN

It would be useful to support the generated output file additionally in a human-readable format (markdown/html), when it comes to automated API testing.

 

We (dev/qa team) would like to attach the file to the story as documentation of the test case. So that the product manager or other colleagues (without license access) can easily take a look at the covered cases. 

The current xml output (sample attached) already provides a good overview and could be extended with background information in some places (for example <action>).

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:30 by ADMIN

Telerik Test Studio has the options to Add a, Bind (to an existing), or Unbind from a data source.

However, the VS Test Studio plug-in only has Add and Unbind.

It would be nice to be able to do everything within Visual Studio.

 

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:29 by ADMIN

Implement the option of passing multiple custom dynamic targets to the same Post Data array.

Currently, this is not a supported scenario in Test Studio - the array is a JSON array, and using the solution to copy the entire array into the Destination Field Name and using the prefix{value}suffix method, will allow to alter one of the values, but not both.

 

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:28 by ADMIN

Please, add a custom goal to help in analyzing load test result data by User Profile. The requirement is to find the "Average time for completion" of each executed user profile. 

P.S. Running performance tests while the application server is loaded is not a sufficient metric for the scenario. 

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:27 by ADMIN

When one need to reconfigure a very high volume of Custom Dynamic Targets regularly in different user profiles, the GUI approach is very slow and inconvenient. 

Would it be possible to implement a feature wherein a file can be uploaded to a User Profile in order to automatically configure Custom Dynamic Targets that are used frequently? Or somehow transfer the desired set of targets from one profile to another test or profile? 

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:26 by ADMIN
When mapping a predefined element, you have the option to add new find clauses. Currently these can be added on the level of the element. It will be useful if you can add clauses for a nested element and create chained find expression. 
Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:22 by ADMIN

Http requests' responses with content-encoding type 'br' cannot be decoded in Test Studio load testing. This results in the inability of using these responses to generate dynamic targets to cover the proper load test run. 

Workaround: Modify the traffic for a load user profile by removing the 'br' encoding type. A third party Chrome extension can be used for this modification. 

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:20 by ADMIN
Created by: Alexandru
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
3

We need to be able to verify the text in dialogs in different browsers.

The current solution is in code, but is not stable due to browser structure changes -> https://docs.telerik.com/teststudio/advanced-topics/coded-samples/html/verify-dialog-text-chrome

 

Declined
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2024 08:13 by ADMIN

We have a large PDF (60+ pages) and try to verify certain content on specific pages. During the recording process some elements are captured with TagName and TextContent and others with TagIndex. In this scenario TagIndex is not reliably, because the document is large and the elements change dynamicaly.

One solution is to update the element's find logic manually on all elements that use TagIndex, but this is very time consuming. 

Another option is to use coded step to find the target element by TextContent and verify it.

1 2 3 4 5 6