Referencing the nuget Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.AspNetCore V2.20.0 in the project that is tested leads to the VS 2019 code coverage failing to produce the report. Here are the steps to reproduce:
1. Create a project from the template ASP.NET Core Web API targeting .NET 5
2. Add a reference to the nuget package Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.AspNetCore V2.20.0
3. Create a unit test project from the C# JustMock Test Project (.NET Core) template.
4. Run the VS code coverage.
Expected result: the code coverage report is produced.
Actual result: there is no code coverage report
We're developing .net 5/core services, using Rider IDE and MacOS.
Please:
1. Add support to run JustMock under MacOS (profiler need to be supported, enabled issue, etc.), or if already supported, please provide instructions of how to activate it per test, for example using NUnit.
2. Add integration with Rider so all the process will be much easier.
Mock.Create<IPool>() fails with
Telerik.JustMock.Core.MockException : Abstract type 'IPool' is not accessible for inheritance.
In Telerik.JustMock.Core.MocksRepository.Create(Type type, MockCreationSettings settings)
In Telerik.JustMock.Mock.<>c__39`1.<Create>b__39_0()
In Telerik.JustMock.Core.ProfilerInterceptor.GuardInternal[T](Func`1 guardedAction) when trying to create a mock object from
public interface IPool
{
object GetItem(in Struct a, out Class b);
}
Considering the sample class
using Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus;
public class Class2
{
private static ServiceBusSender messageToTopicSender;
private static string topicName;
public static void SetRequestTopicClient(string serviceBusConnectionString, string topName)
{
topicName = topName;
ServiceBusClient serviceBusClient = new ServiceBusClient(serviceBusConnectionString);
messageToTopicSender = serviceBusClient.CreateSender(topicName);
}
}and the following tests
[TestClass]
public class Class1Test
{
[TestInitialize]
public void SetUp()
{
Mock.Arrange(() => Class2.SetRequestTopicClient("", "")).DoNothing();
}
[TestMethod]
public void TestA()
{
Class2.SetRequestTopicClient("", "");
}
}
[TestClass]
public class Class2Test
{
static ServiceBusClient serviceBusClient = Mock.Create<ServiceBusClient>();
ServiceBusSender messageToTopicSender = Mock.Create<ServiceBusSender>();
[TestInitialize]
public void SetUp()
{
Mock.Arrange(() => new ServiceBusClient("conStr")).Returns(serviceBusClient);
Mock.Arrange(() => serviceBusClient.CreateSender("myTopic")).Returns(messageToTopicSender);
}
[TestMethod]
public void TestB()
{
Class2.SetRequestTopicClient("conStr", "myTopic");
}
}
Executing the tests in order TestA -> TestB results in failed TestB, but changing the order or runining them standalone succeeds.The outcome of the tests should not be dependent of the execution order.
Allow the developer to create custom behaviors and use them in an arrangement. Something like the following:
Mock.Arrange(() => foo.CalcData(Arg.AnyInt, Arg.AnyInt), new IBehavior[]
{
new LogInvocation(),
new ReturnBaseOrDefaultValue(),
});
The new public API should allow the developer to access the invocations for a particular arrangement. Something like the following:
IEnumerable<IInvocaiton> invocations = foo.GetInvocationsFor((x) => x.CalcData(2, 2));
Implement a new public API that will allow the developer to iterate over all invocations of mock arrangements. Something like the following:
IEnumerable<IInvocaiton> invocations = Mock.Invocations;
The documentation on Fluent Mocking ends with this statement:
Important
Note that when you use Fluent Asserts only arrangements marked with either MustBeCalled or Occurs will be verified. For other tests you have to use the explicit assert.
What this fails to note is that, while this is true of the function "Assert", there is another function, "AssertAll", which will flag an error if any Arranged function call was not utilized.
On a related note, I left other suggestions for this same page a day or two ago. I would have liked to leave the above statement using the same feedback utility, but I can no longer find the control that I used to leave those initial suggestions.
We are trying to run unit tests via xUnit and mocking method occurence using JustMockLite. Method under arrange is creating a underlying Task however, once in a while test fails with following error
build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Telerik.JustMock.Xunit.AssertFailedException : Multiple assertion failures: build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 1. Occurrence expectation failed. Expected exactly 1 call. Calls so far: 0 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrange expression: x => x.CallAsync(IsAny(), IsAny()) build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 2. Occurrence expectation failed. Expected exactly 1 call. Calls so far: 0 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrange expression: x => x.NotifyAsync(IsAny()) build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 ---- Telerik.JustMock.Diagnostics.DebugViewDetailsException : State: build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Elevated mocking: disabled build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangements and expectations: build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=0) x => x.Load(IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Met: Occurences must be in [1, 1]; calls so far: 1. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=1) x => x.InitializePolicy(IsAny(), IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Met: Occurences must be in [1, 1]; calls so far: 1. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=2) x => x.RequestBulkSync(IsAny(), IsAny(), IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Met: Occurences must be in [any, 1]; calls so far: 1. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=3) x => x.CallAsync(IsAny(), IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Unmet: Occurences must be in [1, 1]; calls so far: 0. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=4) x => x.NotifyAsync(IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Unmet: Occurences must be in [1, 1]; calls so far: 0. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Invocations:
Update reference functionality wrongly suggests updating JustMock assembly reference and even more - detects currently referenced one as a lite version, see the screenshot below:
