I filed a prior ThreadLeak:
Thread leak in JustMock (telerik.com)
I think I've found another one: (VS version 16.10.31321.278)
telerik_justmock_debugwindow_service_client!Telerik.JustMock.DebugWindow.Service.Client.ServiceHostMonitor.MonitorTimer_Elapsed
Apparently, the MonitorTimer_Elapsed code is running on a threadpool thread and it takes longer than 1 sec (perhaps it's waiting on a lock?).
Another timer tick occurs and the method is called again. Eventually, the ThreadPool runs out of threads and grows by about 1 thread per second (1Mb /sec leak)
In one dump 2Gig was used (1962 threads on the same MonitorTimer_Elapsed stack frame)
In that same dump there were 52 stacks with this frame:
telerik_justmock_debugwindow_service_client!Telerik.JustMock.DebugWindow.Service.Client.ConnectionSetupServiceClientBase`[[System.__Canon,mscorlib]].get_ServiceAvailable
(this was the same item as my prior report).
The following test fails:
[TestMethod]
public void TestCallOrderWithInOrder()
{
// Arrange
var mockClass1 = Mock.Create<Class1>();
var mockClass2 = Mock.Create<Class2>();
Mock.Arrange(() => mockClass1.Method1())
.InOrder();
Mock.Arrange(() => mockClass2.Method1())
.InOrder()
.Occurs(2);
Mock.Arrange(() => mockClass1.Method2())
.InOrder();
// Act
mockClass1.Method1();
mockClass2.Method1();
mockClass2.Method1(); // <--- this call is not allowed by
// InOrder clause currently
// and throws AssertFailedException
mockClass1.Method2();
// Assert
Mock.Assert(mockClass1);
Mock.Assert(mockClass2);
}
The following test is not working anymore since version JustMock_2021_2_615_4 but was working with JustMock_2021_1_326_1 and older versions:
public interface ITest
{
void Test(string text);
}
[TestMethod]
public void MyTestMethod()
{
var mock = Mock.Create<ITest>();
Mock.Arrange(() => mock.Test("")).IgnoreArguments().OccursNever();
Mock.Arrange(() => mock.Test(Arg.Matches<string>(a => a == "a"))).InOrder().OccursOnce();
Mock.Arrange(() => mock.Test(Arg.Matches<string>(a => a == "b"))).InOrder().OccursOnce();
mock.Test("a");
mock.Test("b");
Mock.Assert(mock);
}If I remove the OccorsNever line, its working.
If I remove the 2 InOrder, its working.
Seems that something change there: https://www.telerik.com/support/whats-new/justmock/release-history/justmock-r2-sp1-2021
Currently, when the JustMock profiler is enabled it provides a performance hit on the test execution. This effect is expected because a profiler is involved.
What we can do is find a more optimized way of instrumenting the methods.
C# 8 introduces default interface method implementations. Attempt to mock such methods with JustMock in elevated mode fails. The following example illustrates the issue:
public interface IMyInterface
{
int IntProperty { get => 0; }
}
[TestClass]
public class UnitTest1
{
[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod1()
{
var mock = Mock.Create<IMyInterface>();
Mock.Arrange(() => mock.IntProperty).Returns(1);
Assert.AreEqual(1, mock.IntProperty);
}
}
Allow the developer to create custom behaviors and use them in an arrangement. Something like the following:
Mock.Arrange(() => foo.CalcData(Arg.AnyInt, Arg.AnyInt), new IBehavior[]
{
new LogInvocation(),
new ReturnBaseOrDefaultValue(),
});
The new public API should allow the developer to access the invocations for a particular arrangement. Something like the following:
IEnumerable<IInvocaiton> invocations = foo.GetInvocationsFor((x) => x.CalcData(2, 2));
Implement a new public API that will allow the developer to iterate over all invocations of mock arrangements. Something like the following:
IEnumerable<IInvocaiton> invocations = Mock.Invocations;
Using elevated mocking mode (profiler enabled) with long path names for the test containers (above 260 characters) causes the following command:
dotnet test
to fail with error:
Testhost process exited with error: Fatal error. System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. at Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestPlatform.TestHost.Program.Main(System.String[]) . Please check the diagnostic logs for more information. Test Run Aborted.
The documentation on Fluent Mocking ends with this statement:
Important
Note that when you use Fluent Asserts only arrangements marked with either MustBeCalled or Occurs will be verified. For other tests you have to use the explicit assert.
What this fails to note is that, while this is true of the function "Assert", there is another function, "AssertAll", which will flag an error if any Arranged function call was not utilized.
On a related note, I left other suggestions for this same page a day or two ago. I would have liked to leave the above statement using the same feedback utility, but I can no longer find the control that I used to leave those initial suggestions.
We are trying to run unit tests via xUnit and mocking method occurence using JustMockLite. Method under arrange is creating a underlying Task however, once in a while test fails with following error
build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Telerik.JustMock.Xunit.AssertFailedException : Multiple assertion failures: build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 1. Occurrence expectation failed. Expected exactly 1 call. Calls so far: 0 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrange expression: x => x.CallAsync(IsAny(), IsAny()) build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 2. Occurrence expectation failed. Expected exactly 1 call. Calls so far: 0 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrange expression: x => x.NotifyAsync(IsAny()) build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 ---- Telerik.JustMock.Diagnostics.DebugViewDetailsException : State: build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Elevated mocking: disabled build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangements and expectations: build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=0) x => x.Load(IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Met: Occurences must be in [1, 1]; calls so far: 1. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=1) x => x.InitializePolicy(IsAny(), IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Met: Occurences must be in [1, 1]; calls so far: 1. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=2) x => x.RequestBulkSync(IsAny(), IsAny(), IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Met: Occurences must be in [any, 1]; calls so far: 1. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=3) x => x.CallAsync(IsAny(), IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Unmet: Occurences must be in [1, 1]; calls so far: 0. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Arrangement (id=4) x => x.NotifyAsync(IsAny()): build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Unmet: Occurences must be in [1, 1]; calls so far: 0. build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 build 11-May-2021 14:36:09 Invocations:
http://tv.telerik.com/watch/telerik/test-drive-your-code-with-justmock
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5755413/typemock-vs-justmock-vs-rhinomock-moq-current-situation-in-2011?rq=1
is in a lot of webpages that point to whats good about just mock, except this link is broken, can you put in a redirect to the actual vids for just mock.
I currently use typemock, but looking for a team solution and having broken links and missing content implies product abandonment.
Where can I find the links to the current vid on just mock?
Thanks
Doug