So you don't have a dedicated place to put this so I'm placing it here with the hope the right person get it.

I don't use the MSI to do my updates because I hate my controls being placed into ind folders that you came up with. I constantly find myself rummaging through them looking for the correct control.

HOWEVER.. if I manually DL them and ref the DLL and create a folder of my own making all the controls flow in in alphabetical order and I can get to the exact one I need instantly.

If the MSI can be changed to ask me for how I want them placed into VS so that happens I can then DL the MSI and get all the other features I lose doing it this way.

After talking with CS/Tech support the asp.net/Core is for MVC type applications. I'd like to suggest dropping the word "core" and changing it to MVC to avoid confusion.

So hope this gets to the right set of eyes.

Cheers!

Ref. attached Image its show horizontal scrolling round with red color.

In business application more number of groups and menu item at that time horizontal scrolling very usefull as shown in the attached image

a radmenu  with input-fields would be very usefull
this would work the same way like a configuration-menu

can we give two Focus Keys in KeyboardNavigationSettings ?

Current -->  <KeyboardNavigationSettings CommandKey="Alt" FocusKey="P" />

Two key strokes -->  <KeyboardNavigationSettings CommandKey="Alt" FocusKey="P + Y" />

Hello, In one of the pages in our website, we have a RadGrid that uses client-side binding.  Above the grid, there's an "Apply Best Fit" button that executes the following JavaScript:
...
...

applyBestFit: function(tableView)
{
  var columns = tableView.get_columns();

  for (var i = 0; i < columns.length; i++)
    columns[i].resizeToFit(false, true);
}

...
...
In IE, it runs VERY slowly when there's 5,000 grid rows.

I found this post: "http://www.telerik.com/forums/radgrid-with-resizetofit-javascript-issue" and read the recommended link: "http://docs.telerik.com/devtools/aspnet-ajax/controls/grid/performance/grid-performance-optimizations"

I understand that resizeToFit( ) is slow under IE.

I would like to propose that you add a new "MaxRowsToEvaluate" (or similar) parameter to resizeToFit( ) that can be used to control how many grid rows are evaluated when determining the widest size of a column.

With this new parameter, I could pass a value of 25, for example, and know that only up to 25 grid rows will be used in calculating the widest size of a column.  That would speed things up a lot I think.

Using this approach, the resizing would not be perfect, because a cell in the column beyond the "MaxRowsToEvaluate" number of rows may contain a value that's really long, but at least it wouldn't make the browser look like it's hung.

Thanks

I'd like to use several masks in order to accept many phone numbers format. 
The component must accept phone numbers with these separators : "-", "/", "|" and space between figures. 
Here are some example of format that i mean:

1- xx-xx-xx-xx-xx 2- xx - xx - xx - xx - xx 
3- xx.xx.xx.xx.xx 4- xx/xx/xx/xx/xx 
5- xx / xx / xx / xx 6- xx|xx|xx|xx|xx 
7- xx | xx | xx | xx 

Evidently, the component needs to accept figures only. Most of the time, the phone numbers are inserted by a copy-pasted

Twice this week, my Asp.net project would not compile because of a Telerik.Web.UI.dll link error. I run into this problem frequently, Telerik is very flakey. My last bug report was this compile problem with another Telerik file.

The solution to both compile problems is to clear the Properties/licenses.licx file. As least the second time, I knew right where to go without wasting time searching the web. A couple hours wasted on the first one on Monday.  I suppose I can expect to clear it Friday again when the compile fails on Telerik.

The Properties/licenses.licx is re-populating itself causing the compile to fail on this Telerik issue. Why have a licenses.licx if it always breaks the software? Your support says, clear the file - they know it causes endless problems.

There is no fix on my side for the this problem, Telerik must do something about the licenses.licx problem in an update.

I have these Telerik compiler warnings. The entire list is Telerik created, misleading and annoying.

Inconsistent behavior between Firefox and Chrome (other browser not tested) when cutting and pasting content within the editor.

We have more advanced cases but I tried to simplify the case here as much as I could.

This has been tested on you demo page at https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-ajax/editor/examples/overview/defaultcs.aspx

I have tested using Firefox 88 and Chrome 90, both on Widows 10.

Reproduce:
Paste the following content in html-mode:

<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
<p>Ut enim ad minim veniam.</p>
<figure>
  <img src="../../images/attractions_LosGigantes.png" alt="Test">
  <figcaption>Image text</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.</p>

Switch to designmode.

Mark text, including the dot after veniam until before the first character in Excepteur

Cut

(First difference noted here)

Goto after Lorum Ipsum
Paste

(Second difference here)

First difference:

In Chrome you get:

<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
<p>Ut enim ad minim veniamExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.</p>

In Firefox you get:

<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
<p>Ut enim ad minim veniam</p>
<p>Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.</p>



Second difference:

Chrome:
<p>Lorem ipsum</p>
<p>.</p>
<p><figure><img src="https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-ajax/editor/images/attractions_LosGigantes.png" alt="Test" /><figcaption>Image text</figcaption>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
</figure> dolor sit amet.</p>
<p>Ut enim ad minim veniamExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.</p>

Firefox:
<p>Lorem ipsum.
<figure>
<img src="https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-ajax/editor/images/attractions_LosGigantes.png" alt="Test" />
<figcaption>Image text</figcaption>
</figure>
dolor sit amet.</p>
<p>Ut enim ad minim veniam</p>
<p>Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.</p>

Inconsistent behavior between Firefox and Chrome (other browser not tested) when drag and dropping content within the editor.

We have more advanced cases (when this breaks things like totally like cutting a block with image and caption into pieces in Chrome) but I tried to simplify the case here as much as I could.

This has been tested on you demo page at https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-ajax/editor/examples/overview/defaultcs.aspx

I have tested using Firefox 88 and Chrome 90, both on Widows 10.

Steps to reproduce:
Switch to html-mode and add the following content:
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
<p>Ut enim ad minim veniam.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="../../images/attractions_LosGigantes.png" /></p>

Switch back to wysiwyg mode

Drag the image and drop it in the middle of one of the text lines. I dropped it just after Lorum ipsum.

Result is very different in Firefox and Chrome

Firefox :
<p>Lorem ipsum </p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-ajax/editor/images/attractions_LosGigantes.png" /></p>
<p>dolor sit amet.</p>
<p>Ut enim ad minim veniam.</p>

Chrome:

<p>Lorem ipsum<img alt="" src="https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-ajax/editor/images/attractions_LosGigantes.png" />&nbsp;dolor sit amet.</p>
<p>Ut enim ad minim veniam.</p>

We prefer the behavior in Firefox as it works when having mode advanced blocks than just an image. In Chrome the content is split into the new context and broken.

The Telerik Bootstrap skin looks like it is Bootstrap, but it is not.  While it is easy to override a Bootstrap style to customize something, every time we do we end up on a support ticket to figure out how to make the same override in the skin.

One common area this comes up is the form sizing.  In Bootstrap, you can use a CSS class .form-group-sm to easily make the form controls smaller.  (There are several other classes as well for controls and form groups.)  The Telerik controls, like radCombobox or DatePicker do not honor this style, you need special Telerik CSS to get them to size.

The Bootstrap skin should have CSS included in it that handles when the Bootstrap control size classes are used.  That way when a Telerik control is placed in a div with .form-group-sm etc. it will automatically resize itself accordingly.

ref: http://getbootstrap.com/css/#forms-control-sizes

I suggest update Device Screen Size for 

Telerik.Web.Device.Detection

using System;

namespace Telerik.Web.Device.Detection
{
    /// <summary>
    /// The device screen size based on the its dimensions in CSS pixels
    /// </summary>
    /// <remarks>
    ///The default ranges are:
    /// Small (to 600) CSS pixels
    /// Medium (601-1024) CSS pixels
    /// Large (1025 - 1366) CSS pixels
    /// ExtraLarge (over 1366) CSS pixels
    /// FullHD (over 1920) CSS pixels
    /// UHD4K = 5 // 3840
    /// UHD8K = 6 // 7680
    /// UHD10K = 7 // 10240
    /// </remarks>
    public enum DeviceScreenSize
    {
        Small = 0, // 0-600
        Medium = 1, // 601-1024
        Large = 2, // 1025 - 1366
        ExtraLarge = 3 // over 1366
        FullHD = 4 // 1920
        UHD4K = 5 // 3840
        UHD8K = 6 // 7680
        UHD10K = 7 // 10240

    }
}

Best,

Jeff

Add HLS live streaming support to the RAD Media Player.

Hi Team,

I'm using Telerik.Web.UI Version 2020.2.617

I have integrated it and added a reference in my web application, asked me to upgrade the version of Assemblies "System.Web.Extension.dll" and "System.Core.dll" has to be upgraded to version 4.0, I did that too, Now I'm getting an error while I'm running or doing build "The type or namespace name 'Script' does not exist in the namespace 'System.Web' (are you missing an assembly reference?)", Assembly it is referring to "System.Web.Script.Services", same error is coming for other attributes like "ScriptMethod, ScriptMethodAttribute"

For the Key word "this" it is throwing as below error

It is throwing an error for "System.Linq.Expressions"

Can anyone help me out on this how to resolve these bugs.

Regards

P L P Kumar

We could use a new calendar control that works differently than the scheduler, or any existing calendar control. 

Overview of features and how it would work:

• User selects a month, the calendar auto draws the month as a calendar view with options to set day of week as short, medium or full length.
• The calendar has an input field which can handle validation if needed. Validation example:
  • Only accept integers
  • In logic, if X = Whatever, then only allow input value of 1.

• Treat as an array so we could loop through the control and read each value for saving to database or to take action on from code.

• Example shown below. This is dynamically creating using tables and HTML. Not the nicest looking, and a pain to reuse anywhere. We could make use of this type of control in a lot of applications.

   

As part of the Fall Creators update, Microsoft are releasing SDKs for their Fluent design system for UWP app design.

It would be great if Telerik could expand their skins to include controls designed to mimic the look and feel of the Fluent design including, where possible, Acrylic, Parallax, and Reveal.   I believe that light or dark themes will be standard on the Fluent design, but users will be able to incorporate the their accent colour preference.  So, at the least it would be great to have fluent light, and fluent dark skins with an easy method of similarly changing the accent colour.

Of course, not all of the functionality of UWP will be possible for ASP.NET AJAX, but since Fluent is likely to become the new standard for UWP app design, I believe that users will come to expect similar skins in their web-apps.

See https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/layout/design-and-ui-intro for more info.

https://identity.telerik.com/v2/oauth/signin?ReturnUrl=...
http://docs.identityserver.io/en/latest/

Hi,It would be really handy to have an best practice identity provider UX 

There are  many ways to skin a cat, but it would be really handy to have a UI component much like you find in the ~/Account folder created by MS that all worked.
That had all the recovery logon by email working, having built in 2FA working.

The quick win would be to tell us how to write a 'Telerik Scenario' and where we can share them in Marketplace.telerik.com ?

Thanks

doug 

We are looking for an option/rad control to have outlook or msg attachment. We have outlook emails with attachment within it. The attachment can vary from PDF, WORD, Outlook Message, Images, and more. The attachment also includes the signature or sensitive data. Currently, we are using a redemption library for an MSG attachment. We would like to know if Telerik offers a solution like redemption we can try. Redemption has a lot of issues. So we are looking for an alternative. Can you please provide an option for MSG attachment? 

Hi all,

I saw an error File/Dir not found 404 on your demo as attached picture.

How to fixed error File/Dir not found 404 by drag and drop folder(s) after I clicked open it?

.NET provides a standard mechanism to resolve any needed assembly via the AssemblyResolve event (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.appdomain.assemblyresolve(v=vs.110).aspx).
Besides self-implementing this event there are tools (like SmartAssembly) which use this mechanism.
We use this mechanism to make application deployment (including ASP.NET applications) as painless and easy as possible.

With Telerik ASP.NET this does not work :-(

Please provide some way/sample/API to make it possible to embed Telerik ASP.NET assemblies.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards
Yahia El-Qasem