Using RadTabbedWindow I noticed difficulty dragging maximized windows between monitors. It seems to happen in multi-monitor environments and only when dragging Left of the PrimaryScreen.
In the video I've included , the blue window is a standard window and can be maximized in one drag across any display.
The white window is RadTabbedWindow and the drag will default to the PrimaryScreen when dragged to the left-most display.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Hi, we have many documents (drawings) and these documents are full of stamps. Unfortunately the pdfviewer does not show them.
I am only asking for rendering stamps properly, not creating or modifying. I want to see the stamps. I also see that some stamps are rendered, not all, but some and they are displayed off the document. as if they were rotated 90deg. If no support is added, at least correct the position they are displayed at.
I have attached two pictures, one opened in Adobe and one with the viewer in my app.
Please consider at least fixing the display, even if no support for stamps is provided. Just display it correctly. By the way the stamps have not been flattened. that is intentional.
Thanks,
Enable the customers to create and modify .pptx (PowerPoint) files . They need processing as well as showing such documents.
Hi,
I would like to report that Z-index have unexpected values when RadDiagramContainerShape are used.
Please watch video first, my remarks points to the video attached to the ticket.
1. Currently there is a possibility that Container A can be hidden by Container B and this is fine.(~11sec of movie)
2. However then i will add Container C to Container A and then drag Container B to overlaps Container A it overlaps only Container A and does not overlaps Container C which for end-user could be very confusing, why Container C is visible at that time.(~20-30 sec of movie)
The problem gets more complicated when i drop Container B to overlaps Container A but without adding Container B as a child of Container A.
In that way it looks that children of Container A are children of Container B
3. When i will add new container "Header" to Container B and then overlaps Container A and Container C then its even more mixed up(~ 30-50 sec of movie)
4. When i will add new container "Header" to Container A and Z-index are somehow refreshed and then in magic way Container_C now overlaps "Header" container from Container B(~58sec of movie)
I would expect:
Fix calculation of Z-index in that way if Container B overlaps Container A it means it overlaps as well it's children. Currently you have flat hierarchy of VMI containers which leads to such Z-index issues.
OR
Expose possibility to override your internal methods which calculates the Z-index.
Hi,
I would like to report that automatic generate of connection point for Bezier connection is wrongly generated when link is attached to Gliding Connector.
Connection point is generated at the position where link is attached to shape. I think for such use-case you should generate connection point taking into account angle of link in relate to shape and generate connection point a bit moved. When connection point is generated at attach position it makes that the "arrow" of link have wrong angle.
I'm attaching video and your sample solution with my modifications to easier reproduction.
Best regards,
BH
Create NuGet symbol packages - containing the .pdb files - corresponding to the primary NuGet packages. The process is described here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/create-packages/symbol-packages . This will facilitate the debugging of problems in the controls code.
The visual indicator of the selected area is slightly above the text as you can see in the attached screenshot.
You can find a fully reproducable example in the attachments
When null value is provided the converter should return Visibility.Collapsed.
Wrong XAML files are shipped with the Net Core themes archive. Instead of Docuemnts.xaml and RichTextBoxUI.xaml the RichTextBox.xaml file should be added.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Download Telerik_UI_for_WPF_Source_[Version].zip
2. Modify the Release70 configuration to Debug70 in the following script - Build_WPF70_Xamlless.bat
3. Execute the bat file to reproduce the error:
Telerik_UI_for_WPF_Source_[Version]\Core\Controls\Input\Touch\TouchManagerV3\TouchManager.TouchMode.cs(242,9): error CS1519: Invalid token '{' in class, record, struct, or interface member declaration [D:\temp\tic\Telerik_UI_for_WPF_Source_2023_3_1114\Core\Controls\Controls_NetCore_5cmyf5ge_wpftmp.csproj::TargetFramework=net7.0-windows]
As I workaround I would suggest editing the NetCoreConfigurations.targets with the following property groups:
<PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)|$(Platform)' == 'Debug70|AnyCPU' ">
<TargetFrameworks>net7.0-windows</TargetFrameworks>
<PlatformTarget>AnyCPU</PlatformTarget>
<DebugSymbols>true</DebugSymbols>
<DebugType>full</DebugType>
<OutputPath>bin\$(Configuration)\</OutputPath>
<DefineConstants>DEBUG;WPF;NETCORE;CODE_ANALYSIS;WPF45;WPF40</DefineConstants>
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors>
<WarningsAsErrors />
<SourceAnalysisTreatErrorsAsWarnings>true</SourceAnalysisTreatErrorsAsWarnings>
<StyleCopEnabled>false</StyleCopEnabled>
<TargetFrameworkVersionString>70</TargetFrameworkVersionString>
</PropertyGroup>
<PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)|$(Platform)' == 'Debug70.NoXaml|AnyCPU' ">
<TargetFrameworks>net7.0-windows</TargetFrameworks>
<PlatformTarget>AnyCPU</PlatformTarget>
<DebugSymbols>true</DebugSymbols>
<DebugType>full</DebugType>
<OutputPath>bin\$(Configuration)\</OutputPath>
<DefineConstants>DEBUG;WPF;NETCORE;CODE_ANALYSIS;WPF45;WPF40;NOXAML</DefineConstants>
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors>
<WarningsAsErrors />
<SourceAnalysisTreatErrorsAsWarnings>true</SourceAnalysisTreatErrorsAsWarnings>
<StyleCopEnabled>false</StyleCopEnabled>
<NoXaml>true</NoXaml>
<GenerateImplicitStyles>true</GenerateImplicitStyles>
<TargetFrameworkVersionString>70</TargetFrameworkVersionString>
</PropertyGroup> The file can be found here: Telerik_UI_for_WPF_Source_[Version]\Build\Imports\NetCoreConfigurations.targets.
- collision with classes CallbackBehaviour and ConcurrencyMode, collision with DuplexChannelFactory
- Collision with SecurityPolicyVersion and may others types in System.ServiceModel.Security Namespace | Microsoft Learn
- - large amount of 40 unnecessary dependencies. These are potential errors in Nuget dependecy resolution.
9,4 MB unnecessary additional files per application.
-Only necessary dependencies should be added.
System.Data.Services.Client.DataServiceQueryException
HResult=0x80131509
Message=An error occurred while processing this request.
Source=Microsoft.Data.Services.Client
StackTrace:
at System.Data.Services.Client.QueryResult.EndExecuteQuery[TElement](Object source, String method, IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at System.Data.Services.Client.DataServiceRequest.EndExecute[TElement](Object source, DataServiceContext context, String method, IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at System.Data.Services.Client.DataServiceQuery`1.EndExecute(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at SalesDashboard.MainRepository.<>c__DisplayClass22_1.<GetDailyActualsVsTargetsByProduct>b__1() in C:\temp\SalesDashboard_WPF_Dev_2023_3_1114_SourceCode\SalesDashboard\ViewModel\MainRepository.cs:line 126
at System.Windows.Threading.ExceptionWrapper.InternalRealCall(Delegate callback, Object args, Int32 numArgs)
at System.Windows.Threading.ExceptionWrapper.TryCatchWhen(Object source, Delegate callback, Object args, Int32 numArgs, Delegate catchHandler)
It is possible for a user to type a value into a RadNumericUpDown control that is greater than the maximum (or smaller than the minimum).
If the control loses focus the value reverts to the maximum value, but in my use case the user will be clicking the OK button on a Window, and this happens while the NumericUpDown still displays the out of range value that was typed. In other words the user doesn't realise that their value was silently rejected behind the scenes.
To solve this I had to raise a support request with you guys, which meant waiting until the next day for a resolution. This cost me time and it also added to your workload.
Whereas if the control had the option to limit the user input to the bounds of minimum and maximum it would have saved me about half a days work to raise a support request and write my own solution to the problem.
I see this has been raised a couple of times in the forums:
https://www.telerik.com/forums/prevent-user-from-typing-beyond-maximum-value
https://www.telerik.com/forums/radnumericupdown-lets-you-type-beyond-its-maximum-value
And the consensus seems to be that it is "By Design".
Please can you re-consider changing this as it is these small niggles that often cost us the most time when developing with 3rd party controls.
TIA