There are no ReturnsAsync methods for mocking container async methods.

There should be a set of methods to mock async methods of a container similar to regular object mocking.

As a user I should be able to write code like:

container.Arrange<IContainer>(r => r.SomeAsyncMethod("data")).ReturnsAsync("returnValue");

Provide support for .NET MAUI projects. 

Let me explain in details the current situation:

I have Unit Test project using JustMock and running into a problem. It seems like JustMock is using the wrong version number to locate the SDK. let me explain:

The project is set to: <TargetFramework>net7.0</TargetFramework>

But it also has <UseMaui>true</UseMaui> enabled

I am getting the following error:

"Framework: 'Microsoft.Maui.Core', version '7.0.92' (x64)
.NET location: C:\Program Files\dotnet
No frameworks were found.

That 7.0.92 version is only for the MAUI workload version, not the SDK versions. It seems JustMock uses a workload version as a SDK version. 

Allow the developer to create custom behaviors and use them in an arrangement. Something like the following:

            Mock.Arrange(() => foo.CalcData(Arg.AnyInt, Arg.AnyInt), new IBehavior[]
            {
                new LogInvocation(),
                new ReturnBaseOrDefaultValue(),
            });

Hi.

i saw this: https://www.telerik.com/forums/how-can-i-mock-multiple-instances-of-a-struct

but still dont understand why JustMock works that way in the first place. why does it union struct mocks by value?

the above solution is only possible when i mock a struct i can change (and then add the id to it) but what about struct's from the framework that i cannot control? Is there a way to tell JustMock not to union mock structs?

Thanks,

Yosi

We're developing .net 5/core services, using Rider IDE and MacOS.

Please:

1. Add support to run JustMock under MacOS (profiler need to be supported, enabled issue, etc.), or if already supported, please provide instructions of how to activate it per test, for example using NUnit.

2. Add integration with Rider so all the process will be much easier.

JustMock interprets anonymous types as tuples. The sample below demonstrates the issue:

public interface IAnsweringService
{
    (int code, string desc) GetAnswer(string question);
}


[TestMethod]
public void AnswerToTheUniverseQuestionTest()
{
    var apiMock = Mock.Create<IAnsweringService>();

    var expectedAnswer = new { code = 42, desc = "Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life" };

    Mock.Arrange(() => apiMock.GetAnswer(Arg.AnyString)).Returns(expectedAnswer);

    var actualAnswer = apiMock.GetAnswer("What is a universe question answer?");

    Assert.AreEqual(expectedAnswer.code, actualAnswer.code);
    Assert.AreEqual(expectedAnswer.desc, actualAnswer.desc);
}

Telerik.JustMock.Core.MockException: The chained return value type '<>f__AnonymousType1`2[System.Int32,System.String]' is not compatible with the arranged method's return type 'System.ValueTuple`2[System.Int32,System.String]'

The threading model of UI apps differs from the test host and this might become a source of issues like the following: System.InvalidOperationException: "The calling thread must be STA, because many UI components require this". The request is about extending JustMock with some helpers that can be used to solve this issue easily.

C# 8 introduces default interface method implementations. Attempt to mock such methods with JustMock in elevated mode fails. The following example illustrates the issue:

public interface IMyInterface
{
    int IntProperty { get => 0; }
}


[TestClass]
public class UnitTest1
{
    [TestMethod]
    public void TestMethod1()
    {
        var mock = Mock.Create<IMyInterface>();
        Mock.Arrange(() => mock.IntProperty).Returns(1);

        Assert.AreEqual(1, mock.IntProperty);
    }
}

Currently, when the JustMock profiler is enabled it provides a performance hit on the test execution. This effect is expected because a profiler is involved.

What we can do is find a more optimized way of instrumenting the methods.