You can use third party inspectors or make one on your own to support it, as it would require additional schema data to help decode the protobuf data. You can refer to one such project on github at https://github.com/tweshlyallpuri/ProtobufInspector/
ADMIN
Simeon
Posted on:06 Feb 2020 14:52
Hi,
Thanks for reaching out. You could make a feature request in the feedback portal.
Regards,
Simeon
Progress Telerik
Do you want to have your say when we set our development plans?
Do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed?
Explore the
Telerik Feedback Portal
and vote to affect the priority of the items
Louka
Posted on:03 Feb 2020 12:03
It's too bad because I love fiddler but instead purchased a Charles license because this feature was missing.
Imported User
Posted on:26 Mar 2018 05:00
The compiled version of ProtoMiddler is no longer available and the solution isn't compilable anymore as the libraries have changed it's API. Some basic support for Protobuf in Fiddler would really be appreciated.
Imported User
Posted on:26 Jul 2017 05:00
I face with Protobuf http requests and responces very often and always have to use protoc.exe -raw_decode.
Would be very happy to see protobuf decoder built-in Fiddler.
Imported User
Posted on:23 Feb 2017 06:00
Look at how Charles proxy does it: https://www.charlesproxy.com/documentation/using-charles/protocol-buffers/
Works pretty well in practice.
Eric
Posted on:28 Jul 2016 05:00
Protobuf is somewhat more complicated than XML and JSON as you need a scheme to parse the data.
See https://github.com/SecurityInnovation/ProtoMiddler for a third-party implementation.