Pending Review
Last Updated: 26 Oct 2021 11:05 by Yan Jun

Hi,

Is it possible to select what type of handing is set for the unexpected dialog in the Test List settings?

The current options provided are either "Do not handle", "Handle and continue" or "Handle and fail test". Whenever we choose "Handle and continue" or "Handle and fail test", can we also choose what kind of handling it is? Either to click "OK", "CANCEL", etc. just like the options to be selected in Test Step.

My AUT often checks for user inactivity and will automatically log off if there is no more screen activity performed. Sometimes the recorded test is to wait for a certain element to appear once a certain process is completed. But there are times the process takes longer time than the screen activity auto logout timeout.

However, before the logout, there will be a dialog prompted for user's confirmation, either to stay on page or directly log out if no response on the dialog for more than 1 minute.

But there is no further handling option to be set in the Test List settings, so normally the logged in user account will be directly logged off due to unable to click "OK" in the dialog prompt. This cause a lot of test cases to fail for wrong reason.

Therefore, please do kindly consider to add in the options to select what type of dialog handling in the Test List settings.

Thank you.

Pending Review
Last Updated: 14 Oct 2021 14:10 by Alex

The Kendo Angular Multiselect control is not covered with the built-in translators.

It will be very useful and consistent if such translator is added in Test Studio.

Pending Review
Last Updated: 08 Sep 2021 12:58 by David
Currently Test Studio load test can only use a dynamic target of type URL, if this takes its value from the response of a previous request. It will be useful to allow data driving this type of dynamic target with data from external source. 
Pending Review
Last Updated: 27 Aug 2021 14:17 by ADMIN

A picture is worth a thousand words...

Pending Review
Last Updated: 09 Aug 2021 08:25 by David
Created by: David
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
4

Allow the ArtOfTest.Runner to publish the results to the Executive Dashboard. There they can be seen by members of the team, who do not have Test Studio installed.

Make it possible for the ArtOfTest.Runner to use multiple execution machines. Distribute the test list execution to other execution servers.

Pending Review
Last Updated: 29 Jul 2021 13:28 by Marc-Antoine
Created by: Marc-Antoine
Comments: 1
Type: Feature Request
0
Currently the WaitForFrame method only takes FrameInfo object as parameter. It will be helpful to use WaitForFrame method with frame name only.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 09 Jun 2021 15:41 by Mark

Currently the exported result contains extended details only for the failed steps. If there is a warning for a step - like the warning that the element was found only by image, this can be only seen in the Test Studio result file. 

Extending the HTML exported result to show the step warning details will be very useful for anyone who review this type of result (attached in an email after a scheduled run, for example). 

Pending Review
Last Updated: 07 Jun 2021 15:57 by Aditya
Update the predefined device config settings with the latest available common iOS and Android devices. Check if the User-Agent request header needs to be updated as well, or more options to be provided. 
Pending Review
Last Updated: 07 Jun 2021 06:45 by ADMIN

When the Scheduling server is not added during installation, the Configure button in Test Studio will be greyed out (disabled). It will be helpful to add some kind of tool tip or note about this.

The solution is to modify the existing installation of Test Studio and add the Scheduling Server feature to the installation.

Pending Review
Last Updated: 07 Jun 2021 06:45 by ADMIN
Created by: Kristina
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
2

Allow users to add custom arguments when executing tests against any of the supported browsers.

This includes the Chrome Headless execution, which always defaults to en-EN language argument for example and you can't change it.

Pending Review
Last Updated: 04 Jun 2021 11:09 by Mark

When generating videos for the test runs from a test list, the output video files uses the name of the test only. There is no indication which is the test list from which this test was executed and when having multiple runs and videos it is difficult to relate these with the generated results. 

It will be useful to generate the names of the videos from a test list in a way to correspond to the test list name and particular run. 

Pending Review
Last Updated: 28 Apr 2021 06:34 by ADMIN
Created by: Alexandru
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
3

We need to be able to verify the text in dialogs in different browsers.

The current solution is in code, but is not stable due to browser structure changes -> https://docs.telerik.com/teststudio/advanced-topics/coded-samples/html/verify-dialog-text-chrome

 

Pending Review
Last Updated: 22 Apr 2021 07:55 by Mark

It will be helpful to have an element, which is defined based on another element. This is similar to chained find expression, but instead of defining the parent element with its find expression, add the ability to reference an already recorded element in the project as a parent one. Then add find expression for the child element.

Pending Review
Last Updated: 05 Feb 2021 10:59 by Damion

Http requests' responses with content-encoding type 'br' cannot be decoded in Test Studio load testing. This results in the inability of using these responses to generate dynamic targets to cover the proper load test run. 

Workaround: Modify the traffic for a load user profile by removing the 'br' encoding type. A third party Chrome extension can be used for this modification. 

Pending Review
Last Updated: 03 Feb 2021 12:56 by Thomas
When mapping a predefined element, you have the option to add new find clauses. Currently these can be added on the level of the element. It will be useful if you can add clauses for a nested element and create chained find expression. 
Pending Review
Last Updated: 13 Jan 2021 14:23 by Cory

When one need to reconfigure a very high volume of Custom Dynamic Targets regularly in different user profiles, the GUI approach is very slow and inconvenient. 

Would it be possible to implement a feature wherein a file can be uploaded to a User Profile in order to automatically configure Custom Dynamic Targets that are used frequently? Or somehow transfer the desired set of targets from one profile to another test or profile? 

Pending Review
Last Updated: 08 Jan 2021 17:18 by Cory

Add the option to add new steps (requests) to an existing load user profile. 

Currently the only option to add even one request in the user profile is to recapture the overall scenario in a new user profile. Then, all custom dynamic targets needs to be created again. 

Pending Review
Last Updated: 17 Dec 2020 07:21 by ADMIN

Please, add a custom goal to help in analyzing load test result data by User Profile. The requirement is to find the "Average time for completion" of each executed user profile. 

P.S. Running performance tests while the application server is loaded is not a sufficient metric for the scenario. 

Pending Review
Last Updated: 08 Dec 2020 14:52 by Cory

Implement the option of passing multiple custom dynamic targets to the same Post Data array.

Currently, this is not a supported scenario in Test Studio - the array is a JSON array, and using the solution to copy the entire array into the Destination Field Name and using the prefix{value}suffix method, will allow to alter one of the values, but not both.

 

Pending Review
Last Updated: 07 Dec 2020 07:01 by ADMIN

I would like to request a change in the find/replace text feature when editing code:

 

  1. Make the find/replace text dialog respond to Ctrl-H with the Replace feature automatically selected.  This behaviour falls in like with a number of other Microsoft products (e.g. Word, Excel, Power Point, Notepad, Visual Studio, etc...) and is what a large number of Windows users come to expect.
  2. Make the find text signify when it has reached the end of the search range (e.g. current document) and ask if the user wishes to start searching from the beginning.  Again, this is how Microsoft products behave and is in line with Windows user experiences.

Thank you.

1 2 3 4 5 6