using Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus;

public class Class2
{
	private static ServiceBusSender messageToTopicSender;
	private static string topicName;

	public static void SetRequestTopicClient(string serviceBusConnectionString, string topName)
	{
		topicName = topName;

		ServiceBusClient serviceBusClient = new ServiceBusClient(serviceBusConnectionString);
		messageToTopicSender = serviceBusClient.CreateSender(topicName);
	}
}

and the following tests

[TestClass]
public class Class1Test
{
	[TestInitialize]
	public void SetUp()
	{
		Mock.Arrange(() => Class2.SetRequestTopicClient("", "")).DoNothing();
	}

	[TestMethod]
	public void TestA()
	{
		Class2.SetRequestTopicClient("", "");
	}
}

[TestClass]
public class Class2Test
{
	static ServiceBusClient serviceBusClient = Mock.Create<ServiceBusClient>();
	ServiceBusSender messageToTopicSender = Mock.Create<ServiceBusSender>();

	[TestInitialize]
	public void SetUp()
	{
		Mock.Arrange(() => new ServiceBusClient("conStr")).Returns(serviceBusClient);
		Mock.Arrange(() => serviceBusClient.CreateSender("myTopic")).Returns(messageToTopicSender);
	}

	[TestMethod]
	public void TestB()
	{
		Class2.SetRequestTopicClient("conStr", "myTopic");
	}
}

Executing the tests in order TestA -> TestB results in failed TestB, but changing the order or runining them standalone succeeds.The outcome of the tests should not be dependent of the execution order.

public class Class1
{
	private string arg1;

	public Class1(string arg1)
	{
		this.arg1 = arg1;
	}

	public Class3 Method(string arg)
	{
		throw new NotImplementedException();
	}
}

public class Class2
{
	static Class3 class3Instance; 

	public static void StaticMethod(string arg1, string arg2)
	{
		Class1 class1Instance = new Class1(arg1);
		class3Instance = class1Instance.Method(arg2);
	}
}

public class Class3
{

}

[TestClass]
public class Class2Test
{
	static Class1 mockClass1 = Mock.Create<Class1>();
	Class3 mockClass3 = Mock.Create<Class3>();

	[TestInitialize]
	public void SetUp()
	{
		Mock.Arrange(() => new Class1("arg1")).Returns(mockClass1);
		Mock.Arrange(() => mockClass1.Method("arg2")).Returns(mockClass3);
	}

	[TestMethod]
	public void TestB()
	{
		Class2.StaticMethod("arg1", "arg2");
	}
}

The test passes, but the debug trace output contains the warning message: "Calling one test method from another could result in unexpected behavior and must be avoided. Extract common mocking logic to a non-test method." even there is no call to the other test methods.

public interface ITest
{
    void Test(string text);
}

[TestMethod]
public void MyTestMethod()
{
    var mock = Mock.Create<ITest>();
    Mock.Arrange(() => mock.Test("")).IgnoreArguments().OccursNever();
    Mock.Arrange(() => mock.Test(Arg.Matches<string>(a => a == "a"))).InOrder().OccursOnce();
    Mock.Arrange(() => mock.Test(Arg.Matches<string>(a => a == "b"))).InOrder().OccursOnce();


    mock.Test("a");
    mock.Test("b");

    Mock.Assert(mock);
}

            Mock.Arrange(() => foo.CalcData(Arg.AnyInt, Arg.AnyInt), new IBehavior[]
            {
                new LogInvocation(),
                new ReturnBaseOrDefaultValue(),
            });

IEnumerable<IInvocaiton> invocations = foo.GetInvocationsFor((x) => x.CalcData(2, 2));

IEnumerable<IInvocaiton> invocations = Mock.Invocations;

[TestMethod]
public void TestCallOrderWithInOrder()
{
	// Arrange
	var mockClass1 = Mock.Create<Class1>();
	var mockClass2 = Mock.Create<Class2>();

	Mock.Arrange(() => mockClass1.Method1())
		.InOrder();
	Mock.Arrange(() => mockClass2.Method1())
		.InOrder()
		.Occurs(2);
	Mock.Arrange(() => mockClass1.Method2())
		.InOrder();

	// Act
	mockClass1.Method1();

	mockClass2.Method1();
	mockClass2.Method1(); // <--- this call is not allowed by
						  //      InOrder clause currently 
						  //      and throws AssertFailedException

	mockClass1.Method2();

	// Assert
	Mock.Assert(mockClass1);
	Mock.Assert(mockClass2);
}