As a suggestion for future development, make Kendo compatible with RazorGenerator.Mvc per this link: http://blog.mirajavora.com/re-use-mvc-views-across-projects-with-razor-generator

With the current version available from the DLL it will be possible to simplify bundling and include of CSS and JS files. I currently do something along the lines of

    //BundleConfig.cs
        var version = typeof(Kendo.Mvc.UrlGenerator).Assembly.GetName().Version;
        var kendoVersion = string.Format("{0}.{1}.{2}", version.Major, version.Minor, version.Build);
 
 
        bundles.Add(new StyleBundle("~/Content/kendo/"+kendoVersion+"/css").Include(
            "~/Content/kendo/"+kendoVersion+"/kendo.common.min.css",
            "~/Content/kendo/"+kendoVersion+"/kendo.default.min.css"
            ));
 
        bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/Scripts/kendo/" +  kendoVersion +"/scripts").Include(
            "~/Scripts/kendo/" + kendoVersion + "/kendo.all.min.js",
            "~/Scripts/kendo/" + kendoVersion + "/kendo.aspnetmvc.min.js",
            "~/Scripts/kendo/" + kendoVersion + "/cultures/kendo.culture.en-GB.min.js"
            ));

And similarly in the views. Getting the version directly from the DLL without hacking around in Assembly.GetName.Version and string manipulation will make this clearer. I'd also suggest you update the documentation to reflect this pattern.

As its a new method/getter, it is not a breaking change.

When using Html.Kendo().DeferredScripts() possibly bundle all the controls initialization in one single jQuery initialization function, instead of a call for each of the deferred controls.

Sometimes it is necessary to be able to define certain fields as editable during and edit but not create or vice versa.

So, we should have the option to not show some of the model fields during edit and possibly not show a different set of fields during create.

For R# action annotations details please check the following link - http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/providing-intellisense-navigation-and-more-for-custom-helpers-in-aspnet-mvc/

And regarding additional actions for url builders - usually I have the action which provides the data for the grids in the same controller so I would prefer to write "... .Read(read => read.Action("LoadSitesData", new { id = Model.StudyId })" instead of "... .Read(read => read.Action("LoadSitesData", "StudySitesAdministration", new { id = Model.StudyId })"

https://www.pioneeroutsourcing.com : The wind shifted, as long as the company does not try to reduce the cost of growth and efficiency, outsourcing in the current form, will grow to include all the other a variety of business tasks.

Your HTML Helpers generate fairly simple HTML and javascript ... but its not easy to read because it is somewhat minified (at least it has no indentation). It would be nice to set a flag somewhere to enable a pretty print option. I assume you have something like that internally anyway?

In a treeview we have different model classes merged into a single model for consumption by the treeview. For example, an organization model and a person model. Based upon an attribute in the treeview model, we would like to present different templates. These templates would be set back on the server-side as the templates are stored in a database. The templates are designed by the end-users.

Thus, when an organization row appears in the treeview, it uses the orgTemplate, and when the persons under the organization appear, they use the personTemplate.

Please add support for your own ORM in the MVC scaffolding.

When upgrading to Kendo MVC, the existing method renames the folder inside the kendo folder instead of the files.  This method of upgrading applications breaks them every time.

The MVC Bundle.config allows the use of the wildcard {version} for version changes.

Why not use this system instead of the upgrade method you use?

Today, when we use IEnumerable<dynamic> type as the model for the kendo grid, the grid is generated fine, but the javascript serialization fails when we pass the datasource to the GridBuilder constructor.
This results in empty grid client side, because the datasource is empty, even if the html initially generated contains the values.

This behavior comes from a problem with the JavaScriptSerializer (also present in the JSon() function of MVC)

Buttons can be added to the toolbar as Enabled(true/false), it would be consistent to have the same option for Visible(true/false)

Currently the visibility can be changed via the API button.hide() or button.show(), however, not when initializing the toolbar using the MVC wrapper

Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC version for custom datasource in the Read method of Transport does not support the method Data(string handler) in order to send additional parameters.

Kendo UI version supports this.

https://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/api/javascript/data/datasource/configuration/transport.read#transport.read.data

Is there a workaround for this?

Create a package for Django will make easier to implement Kendo UI to a project.

Please support VB in your MVC Scaffolding

Static property requires null instance, non-static property requires non-null instance.
Parameter name: expression

Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. 

Exception Details: System.ArgumentException: Static property requires null instance, non-static property requires non-null instance.
Parameter name: expression

[ArgumentException: Static property requires null instance, non-static property requires non-null instance.
Parameter name: expression]
   System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Property(Expression expression, PropertyInfo property) +4376691
   System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.MakeMemberAccess(Expression expression, MemberInfo member) +90
   Kendo.Mvc.Infrastructure.Implementation.Expressions.MemberAccessTokenExtensions.CreateMemberAccessExpression(IMemberAccessToken token, Expression instance) +122
   Kendo.Mvc.Infrastructure.Implementation.Expressions.ExpressionFactory.MakeMemberAccess(Expression instance, String memberName) +107
   Kendo.Mvc.Infrastructure.Implementation.Expressions.PropertyAccessExpressionBuilder.CreateMemberAccessExpression() +70
   Kendo.Mvc.Infrastructure.Implementation.Expressions.MemberAccessExpressionBuilderBase.CreateLambdaExpression() +17
   Kendo.Mvc.Infrastructure.Implementation.SortDescriptorCollectionExpressionBuilder.Sort() +120
   Kendo.Mvc.Extensions.QueryableExtensions.CreateDataSourceResult(IQueryable queryable, DataSourceRequest request, ModelStateDictionary modelState, Func`2 selector) +888
   Kendo.Mvc.Extensions.QueryableExtensions.ToDataSourceResult(IQueryable`1 enumerable, DataSourceRequest request, Func`2 selector) +58

Currently, if I want to bind an ASP.NET TreeList to an OData DataSource, I have to define the data source using a javascript object:

https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-mvc/treelist/odata

https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-core/treelist/odata

I would like to be able to be able to define the OData DataSource using ASP.NET Razor syntax just like the Grid:

https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-mvc/grid/odata
https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-core/grid/odata

Thank you.

Possibility to iterate over all manually defined columns and f.i. set width or any other property. 

Hi  I have some question the "ustr" i want use diagram  "https://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-mvc/diagram" link and i don't know what code it's use in method 

public ActionResult _OrgChart(){return Json(DiagramDataRepository.OrgChart(), JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);}

please i want to help what i do