The functionality will be available in Q3 2015
If you like the Google Material design, you can vote for this item. This will help us prioritize the item and decide when to implement a Material skin for the Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX controls.
Using GIF image in the RadEditor to resize them or manipulate them somehow and saving them, results to a GIF file with black background. You can safely use PNG images when transparency is needed, which are fully supported.
For the time being you can use the following workaround: CSS: <style> html span.RadButton_MetroTouch.rbToggleButton .rbText, html span.RadButton_BlackMetroTouch.rbToggleButton .rbText { padding: 0 25px; } </style> ASPX: <telerik:RadButton ID="telerik:RadButton 1" runat="server" ToggleType="CheckBox" ButtonType="ToggleButton" Skin="MetroTouch" Text="Click"> </telerik:RadButton>
Add a label control which has the same look and feel as the rest of the Telerik ASP.NET AJAX components.
I have a client who is trying to design html page using the RadEditor (an upgraded to the latest internal build this week). The HTML has some IE tags enclosed in html comment fields. they do some browser detection and then write out the <HTML> tag with the appropriate style tags added. They want the code to look like this: <!doctype html> <!--[if IEMobile 7]><html class="no-js iem7 oldie"><![endif]--> <!--[if lt IE 7]><html class="no-js ie6 oldie" lang="en"><![endif]--> <!--[if (IE 7)&!(IEMobile)]><html class="no-js ie7 oldie" lang="en"><![endif]--> <!--[if (IE 8)&!(IEMobile)]><html class="no-js ie8 oldie" lang="en"><![endif]--> <!--[if gt IE 8]><!--><html class="no-js" lang="en"><!--<![endif]--> <!--[if (gte IE 9)|(gt IEMobile 7)]><!--><html class="no-js" lang="en"><!--<![endif]--> but when i insert this into the RadEditor it comes out looking like this: <html class="no-js" lang="en"><!--<![endif]--><!--[if (gte IE 9)|(gt IEMobile 7)]><!--><!--<![endif]-->
When selecting a table element in the content area via the Dom inspector, Delete Table does not remove the table. You can use the RemoveElement from DOM inspector as a temporary workaround.
When RadEditor with Bootstrap skin is inserted in the ContentTemplate of RadWindow, the tools look incorrect. A temporary solution is to override some CSS rules with more proper values: <style> .RadWindow .RadEditor .Bootstrap.reToolbarWrapper .reToolbar .reToolLastItem .reTool { border-right-width: 0; } .RadWindow .Bootstrap.RadEditor.reWrapper .reSplitButton.reTool { width: 42px; } .RadWindow .Bootstrap.RadEditor.reWrapper .Bootstrap.reToolbarWrapper .reToolbar li { border-right-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0; } .RadWindow .Bootstrap.RadEditor.reWrapper .Bootstrap.reToolbarWrapper .reToolbar li.reToolFirstItem { border-left-width: 1px; } .RadWindow .Bootstrap.RadEditor.reWrapper .Bootstrap.reToolbarWrapper .reToolbar .reSeparator + li { border-width: 1px; } </style> <telerik:RadWindow runat="server" Width="1200px" Height="600px" VisibleOnPageLoad="true"> <ContentTemplate> <telerik:RadEditor runat="server" Skin="Bootstrap"> </telerik:RadEditor> </ContentTemplate> </telerik:RadWindow>
When localizing RadSpell to e.g., German, buttons' text is longer than expected and overflows outside the button. To fix the issue you can use an external dialog css file like in this code snippet: ASP.NET -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <asp:TextBox ID="textBox2" runat="server" width="100%" Height="100px" TextMode="MultiLine">Dies ist eine Textbox mit ainigen absichtlichen fehlern.</asp:TextBox> <br /> <telerik:RadSpell ID="spell2" runat="server" ControlToCheck="textBox2" Language="de-DE" DictionaryLanguage="de-DE" SpellCheckProvider="EditDistanceProvider" Skin="Silk" DialogsCssFile="spell-dialog-css.css"></telerik:RadSpell> CSS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- button { overflow: hidden; white-space: nowrap; overflow: hidden; -ms-text-overflow: ellipsis; -o-text-overflow: ellipsis; text-overflow: ellipsis; }
With RadCloudUpload control the users will be able to upload files to Amazon S3 and Azure Blob storage. Also the developers could implement own storage providers and upload files to custom locations.