I'm getting this argument exception:
System.ArgumentException : The type or method has 3 generic parameter(s), but 2 generic argument(s) were provided. A generic argument must be provided for each generic parameter.
   at System.RuntimeType.SanityCheckGenericArguments(RuntimeType[] genericArguments, RuntimeType[] genericParamters)
   at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.MakeGenericMethod(Type[] methodInstantiation)
   at .š.(Type ‹, MethodBase „†, BindingFlags )
   at .š.(Type ‚, MethodBase „†)
   at ”.“.Create(Object š, MethodInfo ›, Boolean ’)
   at ..(˜ )
   at ..(Expression`1 )
   at Telerik.JustMock.Mock..Ž( )
   at ..—[,—]( , Func`2 )
   at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.Arrange[TResult](Expression`1 expression)

Heres an example of a failing test:

        [Test]
        public void GenericTestCanMockTwoGenericMethods()
        {
            var mocked = Mock.Create<GenericTest>();
            IEnumerable<EVENT_CODE> n = null;
            Mock.Arrange(() => mocked.Query<EVENT_CODE, ALARM_CODE>(Arg.AnyString, Arg.IsAny<object>())).Returns(n).MustBeCalled();
        }

        public interface GenericTest
        {
            IEnumerable<T1> Query<T1, T2>(string arg1, params object[] args);

            IEnumerable<T1> Query<T1, T2, T3>(string arg1, params object[] args);
        }

As a developer, I want to be able to automock classes that have concrete classes injected

Please allow automocking support for classes with multiple constructors. This is important for projects not using DI containers but using dependency injection. A classic example is ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web API where standard routing requires a constructor with no parameters. When using DI via constructors but without containers, the overloaded ctor specifies services/repositories and the default ctor passes the default services/repositories.

If I have a constructor like this: public Foo(IAccount fromAccount, IAccount toAccount) { //code }, I need to be able to distinguish between the two accounts when automocking.
container.Arrange<IAccount>() won't work.  Perhaps container.Arrange<IAccount>[0] would. 

Currently, I can only assert all when automocking.  It would be nice to be able to assert individually.  container.Assert<IAccount>().  If we implement my other item (http://feedback.telerik.com/Project/105/Feedback/Details/850-distinguish-between-automocked-items-when-multiple-of-the-same-are-in-the-constru) then it would be container.Assert<IAccount>[0] if there were more than one IAccount in the constructor.