Hi Team,

I would like to request to add an Html/Tag Helper for the kendo.ui.icon.  

Thanks!

Currently, when exporting a file from the Spreadsheet that contains named ranges, which refer to invalid or missing references (e.g., "#REF!"), the exported file is corrupted when attempting to open it in Excel:

Is it possible to remove any invalid named ranges before exporting the file to avoid such a warning when opening the file in Excel? Alternatively, rewrite the invalid named ranges in the exported file, so they are ignored by Excel when opening the exported file.

By default, when opening a file with invalid named ranges in Excel, there is no automatic warning to the user.

I'm in the process of rewriting all Kendo components to use CSP compatible templates. I'm looking at https://docs.telerik.com/aspnet-core/html-helpers/template/overview which shows how we'd use TemplateComponentName() for popup editors and that we would need to rewrite everything in the popup editor to use Kendo Template's AddHtml or AddComponent methods.

Original:

<div class="mb-2 row required">
	@Html.LabelFor(model => model.FileName, new { @class = "col-sm-4 col-form-label fw-bold text-sm-end" })
	<div class="col-sm-6">
		@(Html.Kendo().TextBoxFor(model => model.FileName).HtmlAttributes(new { @class = "w-100" }))
	</div>
</div>

<div class="mb-2 row">
	@Html.LabelFor(model => model.FileDescription, new { @class = "col-sm-4 col-form-label fw-bold text-sm-end" })
	<div class="col-sm-6">
		@(Html.Kendo().TextBoxFor(model => model.FileDescription).HtmlAttributes(new { @class = "w-100" }))
	</div>
</div>

Rewritten:

@(Html.Kendo().Template()
	.AddHtml("<div class='mb-2 row required'>")
	.AddHtml(@<text>
		@Html.LabelFor(model => model.FileName, new { @class = "col-sm-4 col-form-label fw-bold text-sm-end" })
	</text>)
	.AddHtml("<div class='col-sm-6'>")
	.AddComponent(c => c.TextBoxFor(model => model.FileName).HtmlAttributes(new { @class = "w-100" }))
	.AddHtml("</div></div>")

	.AddHtml("<div class='mb-2 row'>")
	.AddHtml(@<text>
		@Html.LabelFor(model => model.FileDescription, new { @class = "col-sm-4 col-form-label fw-bold text-sm-end" })
	</text>)
	.AddHtml("<div class='col-sm-6'>")
	.AddComponent(c => c.TextBoxFor(model => model.FileDescription).HtmlAttributes(new { @class = "w-100" }))
	.AddHtml("</div></div>")
)

While this works, this markup seems much harder to read than the original. Could this be made to be simpler? Ideally I'd like to be able to drop my existing mix of html and kendo components in one method and it'd parse through to render the template properly.

Currently, the Editor's ImageBrowser dataSource only uses the default name, size, and type fields: https://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/api/javascript/ui/editor/configuration/imagebrowser.schema.model.fields#imagebrowserschemamodelfields

Additional custom fields coming with the response (sent back to the client by the specified end point) are ignored and are not accessible in the ImageBrowser's dataSource.

I'm using an OData datasource to populate the grid.  To make matters worse, the Autocomplete retrieves data for *all* of the grid columns.  I'd say the default behavior should only retrieve the current column's data and preferably use OData groupby to limit the results to distinct values.

Interestingly, the CheckBoxList filter *is* populated from the current grid data, behaving as expected.  

My page is attached and the issue is occurring in the detail grid where Server Filtering is disabled.

Currently, the DatePicker can be set to read-only mode by adding the "readonly" attribute through the HtmlAttributes() option or by calling the client-side readonly() method.

Is it possible to implement a built-in Readonly() option, so the DatePicker is initialized as read-only? For example:

@(Html.Kendo().DatePickerFor(m => m.StratDate)
  .Readonly(true)
)

Hi Team,

Currently, Telerik.Licensing NuGet package only has target for netstandard2.0, netframework462 and net6.0. I cannot use .NET 6 for my .NET 9 application because .NET 6 is out of support. 

This is a feature request to either

• Remove the net6.0 TFM and reply only on netstandard2.0
  • or
• Add net8.0 and net9.0 targets.

Thank you,

Arthur

As a result of an EF Core issue, the ToDataSourceResult() is not able to perform the query when the DataSourceRequest object contains grouping.

The problem occurs using the query below, assembled by Telerik routine:

var temp = _db.Pessoa
    .OrderBy(item => item.Email)
    .Skip(0)
    .Take(40)
    .GroupBy(item => item.Email)
    .OrderBy(g => g.Key)
    .Select(g => new AggregateFunctionsGroup
    {
        Key = g.Key,
        ItemCount = g.Count(),
        HasSubgroups = false,
        Member = "Email",
        AggregateFunctionsProjection = new
        {
            Count_Referencia = _db.Pessoa
                    .Select(t => new
                    {
                        t.IdPessoa,
                        t.Referencia,
                        t.Nome_RazaoSocial,
                        t.Apelido_Fantasia,
                        t.CPF_CNPJ,
                        t.RG_IE,
                        t.Email
                    })
                    .OrderBy(item => item.Email)
                    .Where(item => item.Email == g.Key)
                    .Count()
        },
        Items = g
    })
    .ToList();

In the routine where the AggregateFunctionsGroup is created, the Items property must not only be the query itself, but also the fields specified in the main Select. Or, the call to the Select() method must simply be added:

var temp = _db.Pessoa
    .OrderBy(item => item.Email)
    .Skip(0)
    .Take(40)
    .GroupBy(item => item.Email)
    .OrderBy(g => g.Key)
    .Select(g => new AggregateFunctionsGroup
    {
        Key = g.Key,
        ItemCount = g.Count(),
        HasSubgroups = false,
        Member = "Email",
        AggregateFunctionsProjection = new
        {
            Count_Referencia = _db.Pessoa
                    .Select(t => new
                    {
                        t.IdPessoa,
                        ...
                    })
                    .OrderBy(item => item.Email)
                    .Where(item => item.Email == g.Key)
                    .Count()
        },
        Items = g.Select(t => new
        {
            t.IdPessoa,
            ...
        })
    })
    .ToList();

This way, the issue does not occur.

Consider the use of TextWriter async methods for the HTML Helpers, for example the WriteInitializationScript methods.  In certain scenarios the use of the synchronous methods causes an exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Synchronous operations are disallowed. Call WriteAsync or set AllowSynchronousIO to true instead.

This can be resolved by explicitly enabling synchronous operations

services.Configure<IISServerOptions>(options =>
    {
        options.AllowSynchronousIO = true;
    });

though synchronous operations have been disabled by default at framework level as of .NET 3.0.

The grid must allow changes to be made in specific cells, without those changes being committed/saved unless the user clicks on the "Save" button in the toolbar. Basically the users enter in some values for editable currency columns that aren't locked, and (without saving) some columns (both locked and not locked) that are not editable must be refreshed as the value in those cells depend on the edited column. Those cells have client templates and client footer templates which need to be used by whatever is refreshing their cells.

Having this functionality provided built-in will be a nice addition:
https://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/knowledge-base/grid-update-particular-row-without-refresh

Currently, the Content function for Steps in a Wizard only accepts a string value (see API here). 
This means that in order to add a partial view (bound to the current model and its properties), the most straightforward way I could find was to put the partial view (and any wrappers) in its own file and add an extension method "ToHtmlString()". For example:

@model MyModel

@(Html.Kendo().Wizard().Steps(step => {
    step.Add().Content(Html.Partial("~/Path/To/View/Wrapper.cshtml", Model).ToHtmlString());
})

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Html;
using System.IO;

public static class HtmlContentExtensions
{
    public static string ToHtmlString(this IHtmlContent htmlContent)
    {
        if (htmlContent is HtmlString htmlString)
        {
            return htmlString.Value;
        }

        using StringWriter writer = new();
        htmlContent.WriteTo(writer, System.Text.Encodings.Web.HtmlEncoder.Default);
        return writer.ToString();
    }
}

@model MyModel

@(Html.Kendo().TabStrip().Items(tabstrip => {

    tabstrip.Add()
    .Content(@<div id="@Model.TabContainer" class="myTabWrapperClass"> 
       @await Html.PartialAsync("~/Path/To/View.cshtml", Model)
    </div>);

})

Serializing DataSourceResult when it contains several groups is significantly slower compared to serializing the object when no grouping is used. Consider ways to improve the performance. For more context and an example, see Ticket ID: 1677867.