By default, when the "paste" command is added, the default option is "insert" mode ("Paste (Insert)"). Is it possible to add an option that allows setting the default paste mode to "replace" ("Paste (Replace)")?

The FormItemBuilder exposes an EditorTemplateView method which allows a view to represent the item and provides the entire modal to the view.

As the elements available to forms are limited to those hard coded by Telerik and whilst extension methods can be employed to expand this limitation slightly, the ability to create a context specific view would be ideal

The current implementation looks like this

Html.Kendo().Form<Model>()
    .Items(items =>
    {
        items.AddGroup("Test", 1, 10)
            .Items(i =>
                {
                    i.Add().Field(x => x.Username)
                    i.Add().Field(x => x.Password).EditorTemplateView(Html.Partial("MyView"))
                }
            );
    })

In this example, the entire model is provided into MyView. 

I suggest adding an EditorTemplateFor that uses the lamda expression provided in the Field() method such as

Html.Kendo().Form<Model>()
    .Items(items =>
    {
        items.AddGroup("Test", 1, 10)
            .Items(i =>
                {
                    i.Add().Field(x => x.Username)
                    i.Add().Field(x => x.Password).EditorTemplateViewFor(Html.Partial("MyView"))
                }
            );
    })

The "Switch" component does not expose "Label" configuration.

For example:

@(Html.Kendo().Switch()
    .Name("switch")
    .Label(f => f
        .Content("Theme")
    )
)

Whilst I'm aware that I can create a HTML label and add the k-label class. I feel that a Label and a LabelFor are essential parts of the toolkit to prevent brittle code getting created when/if the labels that are created within the toolkit have other requirements

I have created my own implementation for now but I think this should be added to your roadmap, especially as it's such a simple thing to do

Is it possible to implement template options for the "update" and "cancel" column commands of the Grid?

For example:

$("#grid").kendoGrid({
  columns: [{ 
    command: [{
        name: "edit",
        template: {
            update: "<button class='customUpdate'>Save</button>",
            cancel: "<button class='customCancel'>Cancel</button>",
          }
      }]
   }],
  ...
});

Consider the use of TextWriter async methods for the HTML Helpers, for example the WriteInitializationScript methods.  In certain scenarios the use of the synchronous methods causes an exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Synchronous operations are disallowed. Call WriteAsync or set AllowSynchronousIO to true instead.

This can be resolved by explicitly enabling synchronous operations

services.Configure<IISServerOptions>(options =>
    {
        options.AllowSynchronousIO = true;
    });

though synchronous operations have been disabled by default at framework level as of .NET 3.0.

This just seems like a minor oversight since the Enable(bool) method exists on the DatePicker html helper and other Kendo taghelpers support the enable or enabled attribute, but there doesn't seem to be an enable-like attribute for the kendo-datepicker. Thanks!

<kendo-datepicker for="ReadOnlyDate" enable="false"></kendo-datepicker>

Currently, the Content function for Steps in a Wizard only accepts a string value (see API here). 
This means that in order to add a partial view (bound to the current model and its properties), the most straightforward way I could find was to put the partial view (and any wrappers) in its own file and add an extension method "ToHtmlString()". For example:

@model MyModel

@(Html.Kendo().Wizard().Steps(step => {
    step.Add().Content(Html.Partial("~/Path/To/View/Wrapper.cshtml", Model).ToHtmlString());
})

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Html;
using System.IO;

public static class HtmlContentExtensions
{
    public static string ToHtmlString(this IHtmlContent htmlContent)
    {
        if (htmlContent is HtmlString htmlString)
        {
            return htmlString.Value;
        }

        using StringWriter writer = new();
        htmlContent.WriteTo(writer, System.Text.Encodings.Web.HtmlEncoder.Default);
        return writer.ToString();
    }
}

@model MyModel

@(Html.Kendo().TabStrip().Items(tabstrip => {

    tabstrip.Add()
    .Content(@<div id="@Model.TabContainer" class="myTabWrapperClass"> 
       @await Html.PartialAsync("~/Path/To/View.cshtml", Model)
    </div>);

})

In the Scheduler's Timeline view when there are events with the same Start and End dates and one of them is resized, the Scheduler reorders the events automatically, placing the longest event on top and the shortest event at the bottom of the slot. The same occurs in other views, for example, in the Week view the events are automatically reordered from left to right (longest to shortest).

It would be nice to be able to control this behavior and disable it through a dedicated option.

.NET 6 introduced DateOnly and TimeOnly types, but none of the relevant date/time controls support these types.

There is already a feature request to support DateOnly in DatePicker; this feature request is about adding support for TimeOnly to TimePicker.

Currently, when using the default Grid search functionality and the column filter menus, we observe the following:

• When a column filter is applied first, using the Search feature afterward overrides the column filters, applying the search filter with the "contains" operator to the specified columns.
• Conversely, when a search is performed first and then followed by a column filter, the grid generally functions as expected.

However, there’s a specific scenario where this does not work properly:

• If a search is performed and then a column filter is applied to a column where the search criteria are relevant, the Grid returns no data.

For example:

• After searching for "2018," the expected columns displayed in the filters (notably, the ContractNumber is among them).

• When a column filter is subsequently applied to ContractNumber (e.g., setting it to "2018-CR0018"), the Grid removes the ContractNumber from the search filters and adds the column filter with an "AND" operator. This setup returns no data because of the search filters and the "AND" operator.

Expected Behavior and Alternative

This functionality behaves correctly in the Telerik UI for Blazor Grid component - the search and column filters are managed as separate objects.

Is it possible to enhance the Grid filtering similar to the Blazor Grid?

At this stage, the Serialize() method depends on Newtonsoft.Json:

using Newtonsoft.Json;

namespace Kendo.Mvc.Infrastructure
{
    public class DefaultJavaScriptSerializer : IJavaScriptSerializer
    {
        public string Serialize(object value)
        {
            return JsonConvert.SerializeObject(value).Replace(@"<", @"\u003c").Replace(@">", @"\u003e");
        }
    }
}

Is it possible to remove the dependency and use the System.Text.Json serializer instead?

Hi, is there a way to configure the grid so that when it's grouped and later sorted, the grouping state (expanded/collapsed) is preserved?

Kind Regards

Erwin

It would be convenient to have built-in MultiColumnComboBox editing for the Grid.

I was hoping the component would show the addresses formatted in columns (as per a fields list) and then return the address concatenated into a single to the grid field (e.g. from .DataTextField("FullAddress")).

When my company's users create a new "customer site" they upload the customer's logo and then choose some colours that will form the basis of theming for the customer's site.  In that way, a customer will 'feel' like they have their own branded experience when using 'their' website.

The colours are inevitably based on the customer's logo.  To use the colour picker component, I have to train my users to go to Paint, load the logo, choose the colour using the colour picker, go into the palette and 'copy the crazy 6-digit numbers that may contain letters of the alphabet that starts with a #' and paste that into the colour picker of our web site.

Rather, I would prefer if they could simply use an eyedropper from the ColorPicker component using functionality similar to https://imagecolorpicker.com/en  It would save training and greatly improve the useability of my website.

Can I put that forward as being a feature request?

Thanks

Dave A

Implement an AllowCustom option in the MultiSelect, which would make possible to select a custom value that is not present in the data.

This option is available in the Kendo UI for Angular MultiSelect:
https://www.telerik.com/kendo-angular-ui/components/dropdowns/api/multiselectcomponent#allowcustom
https://www.telerik.com/kendo-angular-ui/components/dropdowns/multiselect/custom-values