Email body of report is not detailed just like attached HTML. So that leadership team can view the failure steps from the email without downloading the attachment
Add Test As Step in Test Studio Mobile project. This will enable me to better organize the test scenarios and reuse already recorded tests.
The same feature is available in Web & Desktop projects.
We use the Telerik Testing Framework to run our pre-release tests on our AJAX.NET solution. The newest version contains the MultiColumnComboBox. The problem is, that the Testing Framework is missing a wrapper for the new Control (as the other controls have).
Sometimes customers want to be able to run their test with the browser launching in a special mode (e.g. incognito mode, custom/specific user profile, etc.). If the customer could add custom command line parameters to be used when launching the browser they could accomplish this.
Currently iOS Xamarin application can be configured to be testable on a Mac machine.
A good extension of the feature will be to add the ability to build the iOS application from Visual Studio on Windows machine.
It will be useful to implement handling the scenario where a page supports multiple files download in a sequence
- a prompt to decide whether to allow or block the multiple files download,
- download dialog steps to handle each of the files download location.
In VS 2010 and VS 2008 there was the Test View. From there you can get at a number of Test Studio specific test level settings, such as BrowserType, SilverlightEnabled, etc. There appears to be no equivalent in VS 2012. Test View has been replaced with a Test Explorer, but clicking on a test in Test Explorer does not bring up any test properties. As a result it appears you have no method to get at the Test Studio specific settings in VS 2012.
In VS2010, "this.ExecutionContext.DeploymentDirectory" returns the path to the default deployment directory. In VS2012 however, there is no such default directory and same property returns the path to the project folder. This is really confusing for our customers and we need to either change the implementation or remove that property completely. The following article describes how to set a deployment directory in VS2012: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/ms182475(v=vs.110).aspx
Again another item I have discussed, I operate in a Closed network environment and access to the VU's via the current online validation method does not work. The guys have been great to offer me the option of a specific build but maybe how licenses are validated could be changed to allow for this type of working environment ? - its the only tool I have ever had a problem doing this with.
Based on the documentation, system path is a manual step http://docs.telerik.com/teststudio/features/test-runners/add-path-environment-variables It would be very beneficial when you are setting up multiple test machines to add system path automatically(or an option) as part of TestStudio MSI installation.
I would like to make the list of agents "select all" checkbox, as checking multiple machines is tedious and if you misclick you have to start over as they are all deselected. I would also like to see a static set and save the "email to" in the results settings. I would also like to know who the test case owner is in the email as a option. I would like to have the ability to have the tests that fail in the list create a new test list, consisting of the failed test lists to run at a later time.
I'd like the ability to create my own Step Builder steps.
This way, the QA team could use my custom built steps to achieve common task without our web based product.
In our product, we need the ability to search a table for specific cells and retrieve image input buttons on that cell row. Of course we can easily achieve this by doing a coded step. However, this is a very common task for us and if my QA team could just select a custom built step builder step that has its own specific parameters (TableID, CellText, ImageInputAltText, etc), then I would remove one area of them having to get into code behind to achieve their task. The QA, while able to do some development, its not their core competency, so I would like to minimize their exposure.
Possible Reasons my company would need such:
* Often times we need to count the number of times a cell with a certain word in it exist in a table.
* We have a common set of steps that always needs to occur together (enter in text, click search, find in table, click that link [the start of every process in our product])
* Find a row within a table that has two matching text cells.