Pending Review
Last Updated: 26 Jun 2017 16:43 by Murray
Created by: Murray
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
2
Test Studio should also be able to scan and test for accessibility compliance issues. See https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core for an example scanner. This could be integrated into the main product or as a plug-in.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 14 Jun 2017 16:12 by Credential AppDev
Create a command line option to output the results of an ArtOfTest.Runner execution of a Test Studio test or test list in MSTest .trx results format.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 14 Jun 2017 16:11 by Credential AppDev
The method PublishManager.CreateTRX that some customers were using to convert aiiresult files to trx no longer works in the new versions on Test Studio because JSON is not supported. 
You can use the attached project for repro.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 02 Jun 2017 17:34 by Hina
When a customer first sees the "Verify IsVisible" they are sort of naturally inclined to believe that Test Studio will test whether or not the target element is actually visible within the browsers window. This leads to frustration when they try to use it and it doesn't work the way they imagine it should work (see ticket 814023 for an example of this frustration).

For example, if the element is not present in the DOM, the test will actually fail with "element not found" instead of passing a test step "verify is not visible" as one would naturally expect given the incorrect assumption above. Or the test may pass indicating the element is visible when it's just hidden behind another element or scrolled out of view.

I'm not sure what the right answer is... do we change what IsVisible actually does? Do we change the name of the verification so it better reflects what it's actually verifying (which is the DISPLAY and VISIBILITY property of the element)? The current code/action is useful, once you correctly understand what it actually does.

I'm filing this just to log it so we can start discussion on how to eliminate the ambiguity of this particular verification.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 24 May 2017 19:15 by John
ADMIN
Created by: Elena
Comments: 3
Type: Feature Request
7
To be able to run browser as different user than the windows authenticated one. Pressing shift and right mouse click will allow the option to run the application as a different user. It would be useful if this could be automated with Telerik Test Studio. 
Pending Review
Last Updated: 22 May 2017 08:03 by Christian
test studio integrated code editor - commenting out/in keyboard Shortcuts

Quite simply it would be nice to have a few keyboard shortcuts in the integrated test studio code editor, such as the ability to comment out/in a line of code (or blocks of code) without having to manually place the "/"'s for every line.

I know we can open the projects in Visual Studio, however sometimes it is not worth the hassle when you are already in Test Studio for whatever reason to just switch out to Visual Studio.

Thanks for listening!

Dan
Pending Review
Last Updated: 28 Apr 2017 10:25 by ADMIN
Steps to reproduce:



1. Using the project attached execute the existing test list.

In the 0 test there is a test as step with enabled StopTestListOnFailure. While the feature works fine out of the box, it is not working if the test is included as test as step.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 18 Apr 2017 19:31 by ADMIN
ADMIN
Created by: Andy Wieland
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
4
Please add the ability to create and schedule Test Studio API and Test Studio Mobile test lists.  
Pending Review
Last Updated: 22 Mar 2017 14:43 by Martin Jensen
When adding additional steps to an existing test, they will appear in the beginning or the end of the test. In web testing new steps place themselves under the step selected (often: run to here), and I would love this feature in mobile testing as well. Would save a huge amount of time that I spend finding and moving test-steps.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 14 Mar 2017 15:04 by chris
When Daylight Savings Time ended on November 6, our scheduled tests started running an hour earlier than scheduled.  I had to "edit" each schedule (without actually changing any settings) and save in order for the time in the "TimeToRun" setting in the job details file to adjust for the time change.  It would be nice if this could happen automatically.  Or maybe add a right-click option to for updating the time or something.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 08 Mar 2017 20:48 by Aaron
When drilling down the results of a test list to a failing test, it would be nice to be able to go directly to the test editor for a test rather than having to go back to the Tests tab and traverse the folder structure in order to locate and edit the desired test.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 08 Mar 2017 16:10 by Dennis
There should be a way to run only selected test cases from a test list. If few test cases fail in a list, then we should be able to select those test cases and run only selected test cases.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 08 Mar 2017 15:34 by Dennis
Created by: Chad
Comments: 3
Type: Feature Request
16
It would be nice to be able to include an existing test list as a selection when creating/editing a different test list.  This would allow for simple lists to serve as the basis for more complex lists, making list changes more manageable and simplifying the creation of larger test lists.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 08 Mar 2017 15:28 by Dennis
Now when you run the test through "Run From Here",  "Run to Here" or "Run Selected" it doesn't stop at the break points.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 08 Mar 2017 15:20 by Dennis
When we generate our reports, Test Studio will only indicate to us the number of test cases that were executed. 

The problem here is when we use data driven testing, the number of scenarios executed can be much higher than the number of test cases. For example, if we have 10 test cases in our list, but each test case runs through 10 iterations, Test Studio will only report that 10 test cases have been run, not the 100 iterations. 

This makes getting an accurate report of our testing very difficult. If one iteration fails inside a test case, then the entire test case is considered a failure. 
Pending Review
Last Updated: 06 Feb 2017 14:50 by Lori
Created by: Lori
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
0
As part of the RunResults email that is sent after a scheduled test list is run, I would like to be able to include the test owner as part of the failure information.  We have multiple people developing scripts and it would be nice for everyone to be able to glance at the email and see if any of their scripts are failing.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 01 Feb 2017 16:04 by ADMIN
Many customers have custom templates and custom fields that are required and they wish to populate with the data provided by Test Studio.  We have achieved the same request for Jira custom fields (http://docs.telerik.com/teststudio/features/integration/bug-tracking/jira-custom-fields) and for TFS custom fields (http://docs.telerik.com/teststudio/features/integration/bug-tracking/tfs-custom-fields), so hopefully this is possible.
Thank you!
Pending Review
Last Updated: 01 Feb 2017 12:59 by ADMIN
ADMIN
Created by: Elena
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
1
It would be useful if the, specific for wait/verification steps only, property Timeout could be modified or set globally for a project. 
Pending Review
Last Updated: 29 Dec 2016 12:58 by Sumit
Currently, the selected browser will open automatically before the first steps are executed. If there was a way to prevent this from occurring until after a pretest script is executed that would be a HUGE plus.  Much the same QTP allows you to just execute a script and doesn't require the browser even be open and later you InvokeApplication to start the web based scripting.

For instance if I want to change my hosts file to point to a specific DEV box I need to execute a batch file to update my hosts.  But if the browser is open first then it's going to wherever it wants really.  The only way around I've found is to execute the first cycle with a blank row to skip to the next iteration of the script but at the end clear and go to next hosts.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 15 Dec 2016 16:53 by Matt
Created by: Matt
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
2
TagIndex is not effective in apps with changing semantics. The ability to affix more specific traversal cascades with psuedo selectors would improve performance and specificity in targeting items in the DOM tree.

Examples
TagSemanticPath: 'is exactly' 'my-custom-element table tr td span'
TagSemanticPath: 'is exactly' 'my-custom-element div div span:last'
TagSemanticPath: 'is exactly' 'my-custom-element div table tr:nthChild(2n +1)'
TagSemanticPath: 'is exactly' 'div div div div table tr td td td td'

Reverse traversals would also be very nice to have.