Pending Review
Last Updated: 14 May 2019 08:22 by JC
Created by: JC
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
0

Add Test As Step in Test Studio Mobile project. This will enable me to better organize the test scenarios and reuse already recorded tests.

The same feature is available in Web & Desktop projects.

Pending Review
Last Updated: 13 May 2019 15:12 by Lisa
Created by: Lisa
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
3

It will be useful to implement handling the scenario where a page supports multiple files download in a sequence

- a prompt to decide whether to allow or block the multiple files download,

- download dialog steps to handle each of the files download location. 

Approved
Last Updated: 13 May 2019 07:57 by ADMIN
Created by: Girish
Comments: 3
Type: Bug Report
3

While connecting  to Jira Cloud (https://name.atlassian.net) with valid userid and password, its giving error message "The remote server returned an error :(401) Unauthorized".


Approved
Last Updated: 09 May 2019 12:27 by ADMIN

Test Studio Mobile is missing a Comment step in the Common section in Step Builder.

It helps to make the test steps more understandable to the person looking at them. At a future date, these comments will assist in a better understanding of what is going on in the test, for whoever is needing to change the tests.

Completed
Last Updated: 09 May 2019 12:20 by ADMIN
Created by: shikha
Comments: 1
Type: Bug Report
0

The recorder is not recognizing elements in the iframe and I am not able to record any actions.

Approved
Last Updated: 02 May 2019 14:18 by ADMIN

Scenario:Use a simple Login-Logout test that is separated into two different tests, executed as steps (Login test & Logout test = login-logout test) for performance run.

Issue: The current overview functionality will show the execution of the test steps 'login' and all the individual steps from the nested test, then moves onto the 'logout' test and the steps for the second nested test. The times displayed for the 'Test as Step' steps is the client side time, required for the initialization of the nested test. 

There are two options for more understandable results - the 'Test as Step' step should either not representing any time, or displaying the summed up time of the nested step execution. 

Approved
Last Updated: 01 May 2019 12:13 by ADMIN
Created by: Kevin
Comments: 0
Type: Bug Report
1
The logged line from a coded step in conditional loop is written before the loop starts. It should be placed at the correct position of the coded step.
Approved
Last Updated: 30 Apr 2019 08:46 by ADMIN

Hi ,

 

We are using telerik testing framework for Automation testing. Currently we are executing our scripts in a client VM using TFS builds. Now we would like transform to Docker Execution. We couldn't get the direct solution from any forum for Telerik Testing framework and Docker integration. So please help us on identifying the docker image for Telerik testing framework, so that we will make use of it and we will create a container for the same to run our test scripts in docker vm. Any websites/links related to this topic would be helpful for us.

 


Completed
Last Updated: 23 Apr 2019 10:56 by ADMIN
When there are missing ODBC drivers, excel files cannot be data bound to a test. It will be helpful to include a verification for the availability of that driver and warn the user its installation is required to continue with data bound tests. 
Approved
Last Updated: 16 Apr 2019 13:53 by ADMIN
Created by: Jeremy
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
0

Currently Test Studio supports Toggle calendar action and selecting date from the visible month when automating Kendo Angular datepicker. 

It will be helpful if the support is extended and setting the date directly in the KendoInput is also an option. As of now using Actions.SetText() is not triggering the necessary events and real user behavior is required to handle the scenario. 

Depending on the exact implementation, a coded step may be required to enter valid date. 

Completed
Last Updated: 12 Apr 2019 08:10 by ADMIN

Test Studio  Run-time edition does not deploy the TestAdapter.dll with its installation.

Thus Test Studio tests cannot be executed with the VSTestConsole.exe in a Azure DevOps (VSTS) pipeline. 

Workaround: 

The TestAdapter.dll for VS 2017 and VS 2019 is being deployed to the Test Studio installation folder (for Ultimate or Dev Edition installations) along with the respective *.vsix package. Until the misbehavior is fixed, the vsix package can be copied to the agent machine and installed with double click. Then refer the dll from the respective location. 

Completed
Last Updated: 11 Apr 2019 12:02 by ADMIN
Ability to record a test step and then change the Element with an existing Element.

Here is the workflow:
I record a step and edit the Element.  Then every time I record on the same UI object, Test Studio creates a new element.  Since it creates a new element, I have to manually edit every duplicate element to exactly match the first element in order for them to merge.  I would like the ability to change the element the step is using to an existing element.  
Completed
Last Updated: 10 Apr 2019 05:43 by ADMIN
When you schedule and run a test list you get the following entries in the Scheduling server log:
[05/06 19:32:52,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:12),Execution] JobBroker.ScheduleJobAsync() : Job satisfied all preconditions, id = eae7a94a-c7b8-408f-9021-3a315eeb1042
[05/06 19:32:52,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:12),Execution] JobBroker.ScheduleJobAsync() : Job sent to scheduler, id = eae7a94a-c7b8-408f-9021-3a315eeb1042
[05/06 19:32:52,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:12),Execution] JobsController.CreateNewJob() : Accepted new job, Id = eae7a94a-c7b8-408f-9021-3a315eeb1042
[05/06 19:33:28,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:40),Execution] JobRunner.RunJobAsync() : TestList loaded for job ID = eae7a94a-c7b8-408f-9021-3a315eeb1042
[05/06 19:33:28,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:40),Execution] JobRunner.RunJobAsync() : Job started, ID = eae7a94a-c7b8-408f-9021-3a315eeb1042
[05/06 19:34:10,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:12),Execution] JobRunner.<CleanupTestRunsStatus>b__12() : TestList finished; updating dispatch group header job Id = eae7a94a-c7b8-408f-9021-3a315eeb1042
[05/06 19:34:10,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:12),Execution] JobRunner.<CleanupTestRunsStatus>b__12() : TestList finished; sending notifications
[05/06 19:39:10,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:28)] First trace message from pool unnamed thread (managed ID = 28, native ID = 12868).
[05/06 19:39:10,Telerik.TestStudio.ExecutionManagerService.exe(4344:28),Execution] JobRunner.<CleanupTestRunsStatus>b__12() : TestList execution status expired- removing from list job id=eae7a94a-c7b8-408f-9021-3a315eeb1042

What's missing is which execution server the test list was sent to. This can be important information in a setup that has multiple execution servers.
Completed
Last Updated: 10 Apr 2019 04:43 by ADMIN
The size of failure information field in the verification builder is only two rows and cannot be resized. 

We should copy the text somewhere outside of Test Studio in order to see it.

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a test with a verification step.

2. With an attached recorded right click on the verification step and choose Edit.

3.  The Sentence Verification Builder appears and if the validation fails the information field is really small and unreadable.

See the attached screen shot.
Completed
Last Updated: 10 Apr 2019 04:15 by ADMIN
I have this idea in mind but not sure how to start with. How to add a custom option(control like a button or check box) in the UI?
Completed
Last Updated: 10 Apr 2019 04:09 by ADMIN
From ticket 869169

In the attached screen shot is an example of an ASP.NET partial page update. It includes a URL with a dynamically changing query string. The application needs that query string echoed back in the next GET.

Currently Test Studio load tests do not parse "text/plain" responses for dynamic targets. As a result this scenario is not currently supported.
Won't Fix
Last Updated: 09 Apr 2019 14:04 by ADMIN
ADMIN
Created by: Cody
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
1
When DBMigrator is in progress all you see is "Please wait...". There's no indication how far it's gotten nor how much farther there is to go. The user can't tell if he needs to wait another 5 minutes or another 5 days, or even if anything is actually happening. Some sort of feedback needs to be shown the user indicating progress is actually being made by the migration process.

In addition, when the process is completed, it would be useful to show something like "N records migrated" to indicate success or failure of the migration process. Instead currently when the process is finished the "Please wait..." is removed. The user can only assume the process was successful and how much data was migrated.
Won't Fix
Last Updated: 09 Apr 2019 14:03 by ADMIN
Displayu the full test list name/Execured browser in the tooltip in the same way as it is in the calendar view on results tab.

Refer to the attachment provided internally
Completed
Last Updated: 09 Apr 2019 12:59 by ADMIN
Currently when a test step is set to SimulateRealClick or SimulateRealTyping, the target element is unconditionally scrolled to the top of the browser window, even in cases where the element is already visible.
It would be more efficient to test if the target element is already fully visible and only scroll when needed.
Completed
Last Updated: 09 Apr 2019 12:59 by ADMIN
Currently when Test Studio wants to scroll an element to make it visible (such as when SimulateRealClick or SimulateRealTyping is enabled) Test Studio will always, and unconditionally, scroll the element to the top. This causes problems for a few applications that have a static UI element, the target element ends up being scrolled underneath this static UI element.
It would be helpful to have a global setting which controls whether the target element is scrolled to the top or the bottom of the browser window. The parameter is available in the API, just need to expose it as a step setting, or a global setting so that customers aren't forced to convert the step to code and override the default behavior, which can be time consuming when there are lots of steps that this must be done on.