Pending Review
Last Updated: 13 Oct 2016 11:00 by ADMIN
Test Studio Results could be synced to HP Quality Center only once. Each action after that does not change their state - their status (Passed/Failed) cannot be seen, test results under a test set cannot be seen and synced. Adjust Test Studio results to be compatible to be synced in HP QC.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 05 Sep 2016 13:42 by Valentijn
It would be very nice if the trial version had some more links to information and youtube video's f.i. if hovering on some items.

f.e. how can i use the local data in a test step?
Pending Review
Last Updated: 09 Jul 2016 17:14 by Robert
Seems obvious now, but I was tripped up by why my source bitmap and test bitmap were not comparing equal. It was because the Capture() grabbed the background color of the page and my source bitmap has a transparent background. Would it be practical to ignore transparent areas from the source to the test image?
Pending Review
Last Updated: 20 Jun 2016 07:42 by ADMIN
Multilevel nested data driven tests in a project (find attached). See structure below: 

Initial test -> runme - root (fail) 
--calls ''lvl1 - dd" which is datadriven

lvl1 - dd
--calls "lvl2 - dd (pass DD to lvl3)" which is datadriven

lvl2 - dd (pass DD to lvl3)
--calls "lvl3 - dd inherit" which is datadriven + inheritparentdatasource


Expected behavior: lvl3 inherits lvl2 data and all tests pass

Actual behavior: lvl3 inherits lvl1 data and doesn't find a match and all tests fail. 

A user expectation is that inherited data is only a level above in the nested structure.


For reference in the project is also added an initial test "runme - root (ok)" which works fine since it calls a variant of "lvl1" that is not data driven.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 20 Mar 2019 13:48 by Daniel
Based on the documentation, system path is a manual step
http://docs.telerik.com/teststudio/features/test-runners/add-path-environment-variables

It would be very beneficial when you are setting up multiple test machines to add system path automatically(or an option) as part of TestStudio MSI installation.


Pending Review
Last Updated: 13 May 2016 14:22 by Brandon
ADMIN
Created by: Ivaylo
Comments: 1
Type: Feature Request
5
It would be nice if we implement a ScrollToMiddle feature in Test Studio. The reason for this is that we have ScrollToTop and ScrollToBottom, but sometimes when we have static elements  for example static header or footer in a page the following problem is experienced:

In a test if you want to click on an element that is scrolled to visible the element in question is getting under the static header or footer on the page and cannot be clicked.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 13 May 2016 07:43 by ADMIN
ADMIN
Created by: Ivaylo
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
3
Please add the ability to convert handle dialog recorded steps in code.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 12 May 2016 14:33 by Lori
I would like to see the name of the machine that ran the test list as part of the Manage Results dialog.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 07 Jun 2016 09:09 by Medha
In a *coded step*, I want to set a variable (SetExtractedValue) containing the machine name.  Later, in the *Visual Steps*, I want to use an IF statement to interrogate the value of the variable and make a decision as to whether one block of statements should be run depending on the value.
So, if in the coded step, the following lines are found:
     string sComputerName = System.Environment.MachineName;
     SetExtractedValue("RunningComputerName", sComputerName.ToString());

Then later, in a Visual Step, I want some include an IF statement with something like:
     IF (GetExtractedValue("RunningComputerName") = "BEDNERLT")
          do this block of visual steps
     ELSE
          do this other block of visual steps

As a corollary request, allow a visual step to set the value of a variable that can be accessed by a coded step.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 09 May 2016 14:32 by Steve
Every test we have has a Login test as step associated... so when creating a new test this always needs to be first.

So lets say we have 400 tests, thats 400 checkmarks we need to make sure are unchecked before running a test list (dont want the login to trip twice)... so then lets say a handful of tests fail and we need to go back to editing them, we need to re-toggle that checkmark on the single test, and then remember to remove it later (which someone almost always forgets).

It would be great to just select that step and have a property to say "Ignore in TestList" so when X test is added to the list, that STEP just gets ignored...

This would save us so much manually work... no more checkmark toggles!
Pending Review
Last Updated: 28 Apr 2016 18:28 by Steve
Created by: Larry
Comments: 1
Type: Feature Request
3
Please add Ctrl+f and Ctrl+h to the code behind views to be able to search and replace text.

Please add Ctrl+Tab functionality to be able to switch between open files.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 28 Apr 2016 09:48 by ADMIN
Created by: Larry
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
0
Expect this feature to show up under the Common section along with Refresh Browser.

With many AJAX requests, Test Studio does not recognize changes and I would like to avoid a coded step using ActiveBrowser.RefreshDom()
Pending Review
Last Updated: 28 Apr 2016 18:00 by Steve
Created by: Steve
Comments: 0
Type: Feature Request
0
I would like to be able to Wait on specific ajax call in a test step.. so not just an ajax timeout, but like (pseudo):
- Wait for route /RestApi/thing/1 
- Once complete, continue test execution
Pending Review
Last Updated: 28 Apr 2016 18:28 by Steve
Created by: Steve
Comments: 1
Type: Feature Request
0
If I have an element in my elements list, of ControlType HtmlUnorderedList why is there no default verification step to validate item counts? ...seems like a no brainer?  Would improve test creation further for it to be in the recorder as well.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 28 Apr 2016 09:48 by ADMIN
In Test Studio UI there is currently no way to checkout the entire project with all its files or if you checkout a folder to automatically checkout all files in it - it is very useful to be able to do that in certain situations, so it will be great if we can implement such behavior. In Visual Studio there is a dialog from which you select which items (in project or folder) to checkout, so we can go in this direction also
Pending Review
Last Updated: 24 May 2017 19:15 by John
ADMIN
Created by: Elena
Comments: 3
Type: Feature Request
7
To be able to run browser as different user than the windows authenticated one. Pressing shift and right mouse click will allow the option to run the application as a different user. It would be useful if this could be automated with Telerik Test Studio. 
Pending Review
Last Updated: 29 Apr 2016 06:07 by ADMIN
Steps to reproduce: 

1. Connect a project to Team Foundation Service

2. Create a test list 

3. Schedule it with option 'Get Latest' checked. 

Expected behavior: To execute the test list successful at the scheduled time

Actual: An error appears that the source control server cannot be reached and test list is not executed.
Pending Review
Last Updated: 20 Apr 2016 06:13 by VVP
Hi,

Currently Telerik Test Studio have all basic asserts for UI level validation.
We are finding some gaps in form of missing Assert.Fail  and Assert.Ignore commands.

Sometimes apart from validating UI elements or validating conditions, we need to determine pass/ fail test based on return values from single or multiple functions. 

So for that purpose we are looking for Assert.Fail / Assert.Ignore similar to ones available in Nunit/ Mstest Frameworks.

Thanks,
VVP
Pending Review
Last Updated: 19 Apr 2016 09:40 by VVP
I have implemented "IExecutionExtension' for generating custom reports after script execution.
I am able to get total execution time for a test . But i also need to find out test time for each coded steps.

For eg - I have a test named GmailVerification and 3 codedsteps named 
a) Navigation, b) Login c) Verification.
 I am getting total time for GmailVerification , but not for Navigation or Login or Verification.

Can you please implement feature so that i can calculate each Codedstep execution duration.

Thanks,
VVP
Pending Review
Last Updated: 19 Apr 2016 09:34 by VVP
Created by: VVP
Comments: 2
Type: Feature Request
1
Telerik should offer capability to execute individual coded steps via commandline. There may be many coded steps in a .tstest file. Sometime we want to execute only some specific coded steps.
So if Artoftest.runner can provide that, it will allow much more flexibility for automation.