Currently, when you set SplitWorksheetOnPageBreak to True, the Excel Sheet name is formed from the DocumentName or ReportName and the number of the page.

It would be very helpful if the report authors can manipulate these names with Expressions.

Currently, if I want to see what the device info settings for an extension like the PDF are, I need to open the documentation - Telerik Reporting Configuring the Output Formats PDF Device Information Settings - Telerik Reporting, then copy the setting that I wish to use in my code.

It would be easier and safer if the device information settings for each format were exposed as a public enum/class. On that note, it would also be easier if the available formats were exposed as well, instead of manually typing them. For example:

public static classTelerikDeviceInfoSetting
{
    public static class PDF
    {
        public const string DOCUMENTTITLE = "DocumentTitle";
        public const string DOCUMENTAUTHOR = "DocumentAuthor";
        public const string DOCUMENTSUBJECT = "DocumentSubject";
        public const string DOCUMENTPRODUCER = "DocumentProducer";
        public const string DOCUMENTCREATOR = "DocumentCreator";
    }

    public static class XLSX
    {
        public const string USENATIVEPAGEHEADER = "UseNativePageHeader";
        public const string USENATIVEPAGEFOOTER = "UseNativePageFooter";
        public const string SHOWGRIDLINES = "ShowGridlines";
    }
}

public static class TelerikRenderingExtension

{

public const string PDF = "PDF";

public const string XLSX = "XLSX";

}

The Telerik.Reporting documentation mentions that the Telerik.Reporting.* libraries should be available on nuget.org with the most recent release. However, when I search for Telerik.Reporting in the NuGet Gallery, I am not able to find any Telerik.Reporting.* package. The other products we use (UI for WPF, Document Processing) seem to be available though.

-----------------------------------------

Staff note: On the Reporting side, our initial goal was indeed to make Telerik Reporting available through nuget.org, alongside the rest of the Telerik product portfolio. However, we are currently investigating an issue that is preventing us from publishing the Telerik.Reporting packages to nuget.org, which has delayed their availability.

Please use this feedback item to subscribe to updates and receive a notification as soon as the Telerik.Reporting packages become available on nuget.org.

When generating PDF/UA files, we need to have special objects that are read by an internal system but ignored by screen readers. This cannot be achieved with the existing functionality.

It would be beneficial if we could configure reports so that specific objects inside the generated document are ignored by screen readers. For example, by setting a special value to the AccessibleRole property of a text box. 

I am using the Standalone Report Designer for .NET to open a code-based report from an application that was migrated from .NET Framework. Before the migration, function calls defined in the designer.cs file were preserved and evaluated at runtime as expected. However, after migrating to the code-based reports functionality supported by the Standalone Report Designer for .NET, these function calls are evaluated immediately during the report import process, and the resulting values are then serialized and stored in the report definition.

It would be nice if the function calls were preserved in the imported report, allowing them to be evaluated later at runtime, as their return values may change depending on the execution context.

At the moment it's only possible to have your reports in old-fashioned projects.

It should be possible to add/design reports to SDK-style projects. That should work no matter what target framework is (.NET Core, .NET Standard or .NET Framework).

Our clients enter information using the radeditor and in many cases want to embedded tables and graphics into their text.  Using your reporting tool there is no way to print this information.  I know you have suggested using your table and image tools, but that doesn't work when you are dealing with freely formatted text so the existance and location of the tables and images cannot be predicted.

When using the "Close"/"Close All" options when a report has unsaved modifcations, a warning is shown, but you are forced to save the report or close the window/tab to leave definition file unmodified.

A "close and discard changes" option is helpful and convenient - one can cancel some edits without hoping that a bunch of "Ctrl - Z" presses will clear everything, refer to one report without concern about accidental modifcations (can be editing others), etc.

In the standalone designer, it would be helpful if you could drag and drop the column headers to reorder.  At present you have to add a new column and delete the old one, remembering to copy all properties.

I have been forcing my webservice data source into a workable solution for making GraphQL requests. Right now in order for us to use GraphQL, we have to build out the request manually with a string such as the following:

{"query: "query GetSomeResult($input: Int!) {result {id name}}",
"variables": "{"input": @parameter}"
}

While this is a normal way to hand craft a GraphQL request, the issue I have is that it shouldn't need to be that hard. Also I get no intellisense or suggestion in regards to the data returning. This means that when I try to bind data to a text box, I have to visually validate that the [=Fields....] is actually correct by looking at the GraphQL query and at the code base. I would love to see the ability to to just say have a set of standard api technologies we could implement from such as GraphQL queries, GRPc queries, or any other contract style request. I would expect that the data source logic would be smart enough to parse the query (at least for GQL) and be able to provide reccomendations.

Also a major issue we have had is in being able to pass that data source to subReports, or dealing with any nested objects such as a user.address.addressLine1 would not be able to be found if address is a nested values like the following

user: {
  address: {
    addressLine1
  }
}

Is there a way to have the linear gauge display a value above the indicator?